Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gabel, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis : a study (2006) 0.02 
    0.016960748 = sum of:
  0.01522842 = product of:
    0.06091368 = sum of:
      0.06091368 = weight(_text_:authors in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06091368 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053056188 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0017323275 = product of:
    0.003464655 = sum of:
      0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.003464655 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053056188 = queryNorm
          0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Citation-chasing is proposed as a method of discovering additional terms to enhance subjectsearch retrieval. Subjects attached to OCLC records for cited works are compared to those attached to original citing sources. Citing sources were produced via a subject-list search in a library catalog using the LCSH "Language and languages-Origin." A subject-search was employed to avoid subjectivity in choosing sources. References from the sources were searched in OCLC where applicable, and the subject headings were retrieved. The subjects were ranked by citation-frequency and tiered into 3 groups in a Bradford-like distribution. Highly cited subjects were produced that were not revealed through the original search. A difference in relative importance among the subjects was also revealed. Broad extra-linguistic topics like evolution are more prominent than specific linguistic topics like phonology. There are exceptions, which appear somewhat predictable by the amount of imbalance in citation-representation among the 2 sources. Citation leaders were also produced for authors and secondary-source titles.
    Pages
    S.19-25
  2. Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis (2006) 0.00 
    8.6616375E-4 = product of:
  0.0017323275 = sum of:
    0.0017323275 = product of:
      0.003464655 = sum of:
        0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 61) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003464655 = score(doc=61,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 61, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=61)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 33(2006) no.2, S.86-95