Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Galeffi, A."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Galeffi, A.: ¬The spatial value of information (2013) 0.00 
    0.0012762066 = product of:
  0.0025524131 = sum of:
    0.0025524131 = product of:
      0.0051048263 = sum of:
        0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051048263 = score(doc=791,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Conceptual models created by archival, library, and museum communities significantly influence the way in which data are displayed and aggregated. What 's the reason behind this great attraction to conceptual models? Perhaps part of the explanation can be found in the growing importance of the visual representa tion of information. Concepts seem to be far more readily comprehended when represented in space in a visual way, a way that brings them closer to being images or maps. Like a geographical map, conceptual models disclose specific points, meaning entities, and identify relationships between these, thereby creating connections. If archives, libraries, and museums generate different "landscapes," how will the people who consult these at times discordant maps react? Which conceptual horizons should we offer our users? And will they be compatible with those they expect? Do we not perhaps risk increasing the chasm between information professionals and users?
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.3, S.182-186
  2. Galeffi, A.; Sardo, A.L.: Cataloguing, a necessary evil : critical aspects of RDA (2016) 0.00 
    7.520119E-4 = product of:
  0.0015040238 = sum of:
    0.0015040238 = product of:
      0.0030080476 = sum of:
        0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 2952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0030080476 = score(doc=2952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046063907 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.2, S.163-197

Languages

Types