Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Galvin, T.J."
  1. Galvin, T.J.: ¬The case technique in education for reference service (1963) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 5744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=5744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Galvin, T.J.: Teaching reference with case studies : an interim report (1965) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 5798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=5798,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5798, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5798)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Galvin, T.J.: Case studies and case method (1970) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 7529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=7529,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7529, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7529)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Galvin, T.J.: Convergence or divergence in education for the information professions : an opinion paper (1995) 0.00
    0.0023678814 = product of:
      0.0047357627 = sum of:
        0.0047357627 = product of:
          0.009471525 = sum of:
            0.009471525 = weight(_text_:a in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009471525 = score(doc=2097,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A long standing tension exists in education for the information professions between unification (convergence) and specialization (divergence). Exemplifying and exacerbating this tension are such persistently controversial issues as striking an optimal balance between theory and practice in professional curricula; the appropriate place, if any, in the curriculum for skills training; and whether the most important obligation of a professional school is to give students the practical knowledge andskills needed for entry-level jobs or to provide a theoretical base for lifelong career development? These issues are further complicated by the existence of multiple career entry paths and educational options for many categories of information professionals, by status hierarchies both within universities and within the information professions themselves, and by the historic division between educators and practioners
    Type
    a