Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

4.8283124E-4 = product of:
  0.007242468 = sum of:
    0.004988801 = weight(_text_:in in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004988801 = score(doc=1606,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
    0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002253667 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.021569785 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
  0.06666667 = coord(2/30)

Abstract

This article discusses the rationale for creating historiographs of scholarly topics using a new program called HistCite(TM), which produces a variety of analyses to aid the historian identify key events (papers), people (authors), and journals in a field. By creating a genealogic profile of the evolution, the program aids the scholar in evaluating the paradigm involved.

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.400-412