Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003)
0.03
0.02575541 = sum of:
0.02393987 = product of:
0.09575948 = sum of:
0.09575948 = weight(_text_:authors in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575948 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052129436 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0018155396 = product of:
0.0054466184 = sum of:
0.0054466184 = weight(_text_:s in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054466184 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.052129436 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the rationale for creating historiographs of scholarly topics using a new program called HistCite(TM), which produces a variety of analyses to aid the historian identify key events (papers), people (authors), and journals in a field. By creating a genealogic profile of the evolution, the program aids the scholar in evaluating the paradigm involved.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.400-412
