Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Geras, A."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Should we introduce a dislike button for academic articles? (2020) 0.04 
    0.037163623 = product of:
  0.074327245 = sum of:
    0.074327245 = sum of:
      0.018688826 = weight(_text_:m in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018688826 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04552693 = queryNorm
          0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.018628798 = weight(_text_:h in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018628798 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04552693 = queryNorm
          0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037009623 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04552693 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There is a mutual resemblance between the behavior of users of the Stack Exchange and the dynamics of the citations accumulation process in the scientific community, which enabled us to tackle the outwardly intractable problem of assessing the impact of introducing "negative" citations. Although the most frequent reason to cite an article is to highlight the connection between the 2 publications, researchers sometimes mention an earlier work to cast a negative light. While computing citation-based scores, for instance, the h-index, information about the reason why an article was mentioned is neglected. Therefore, it can be questioned whether these indices describe scientific achievements accurately. In this article we shed insight into the problem of "negative" citations, analyzing data from Stack Exchange and, to draw more universal conclusions, we derive an approximation of citations scores. Here we show that the quantified influence of introducing negative citations is of lesser importance and that they could be used as an indicator of where the attention of the scientific community is allocated.
    Date
    6. 1.2020 18:10:22
  2. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Time to vote : temporal clustering of user activity on Stack Overflow (2022) 0.00 
    0.0044049984 = product of:
  0.008809997 = sum of:
    0.008809997 = product of:
      0.02642999 = sum of:
        0.02642999 = weight(_text_:m in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02642999 = score(doc=765,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04552693 = queryNorm
            0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Question-and-answer (Q&A) sites improve access to information and ease transfer of knowledge. In recent years, they have grown in popularity and importance, enabling research on behavioral patterns of their users. We study the dynamics related to the casting of 7 M votes across a sample of 700 k posts on Stack Overflow, a large community of professional software developers. We employ log-Gaussian mixture modeling and Markov chains to formulate a simple yet elegant description of the considered phenomena. We indicate that the interevent times can naturally be clustered into 3 typical time scales: those which occur within hours, weeks, and months and show how the events become rarer and rarer as time passes. It turns out that the posts' popularity in a short period after publication is a weak predictor of its overall success, contrary to what was observed, for example, in case of YouTube clips. Nonetheless, the sleeping beauties sometimes awake and can receive bursts of votes following each other relatively quickly.

Authors