Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gil-Leiva, I."
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Pulgarin, A.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature : 1956-2000 (2004) 0.03 
    0.03257599 = sum of:
  0.030150732 = product of:
    0.12060293 = sum of:
      0.12060293 = weight(_text_:authors in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12060293 = score(doc=2566,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053056188 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.0024252585 = product of:
    0.004850517 = sum of:
      0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004850517 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.053056188 = queryNorm
          0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We present a bibliometric study of a corpus of 839 bibliographic references about automatic indexing, covering the period 1956-2000. We analyse the distribution of authors and works, the obsolescence and its dispersion, and the distribution of the literature by topic, year, and source type. We conclude that: (i) there has been a constant interest on the part of researchers; (ii) the most studied topics were the techniques and methods employed and the general aspects of automatic indexing; (iii) the productivity of the authors does fit a Lotka distribution (Dmax=0.02 and critical value=0.054); (iv) the annual aging factor is 95%; and (v) the dispersion of the literature is low.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.2, S.365-377
  2. Souza, R.R.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Automatic indexing of scientific texts : a methodological comparison (2016) 0.00 
    0.001385862 = product of:
  0.002771724 = sum of:
    0.002771724 = product of:
      0.005543448 = sum of:
        0.005543448 = weight(_text_:s in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005543448 = score(doc=4913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.243-250
  3. Gil-Leiva, I.; Munoz, J.V.R.: Analisis de los descriptores de diferentes areas del conocimiento indizades en bases de datos del CSIC : Aplicacion a la indizacion automatica (1997) 0.00 
    0.0010393964 = product of:
  0.0020787928 = sum of:
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041575856 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 20(1997) no.2, S.150-160
  4. Gil-Leiva, I.: SISA-automatic indexing system for scientific articles : experiments with location heuristics rules versus TF-IDF rules (2017) 0.00 
    0.0010393964 = product of:
  0.0020787928 = sum of:
    0.0020787928 = product of:
      0.0041575856 = sum of:
        0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041575856 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.053056188 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.3, S.139-162

Authors

Years

Languages