Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gingras, Y."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The impact factor's Matthew Effect : a natural experiment in bibliometrics (2010) 0.00
    0.0024520915 = product of:
      0.024520915 = sum of:
        0.024520915 = product of:
          0.07356274 = sum of:
            0.07356274 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07356274 = score(doc=3338,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.5013491 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.424-427
    Year
    2010
  2. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007) (2010) 0.00
    0.0020434097 = product of:
      0.020434096 = sum of:
        0.020434096 = product of:
          0.06130229 = sum of:
            0.06130229 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06130229 = score(doc=3622,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 66(2010) no.2, S.179-190
    Year
    2010
  3. Lozano, G.A.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012) 0.00
    0.0016227098 = product of:
      0.016227098 = sum of:
        0.016227098 = product of:
          0.048681293 = sum of:
            0.048681293 = weight(_text_:1990 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048681293 = score(doc=486,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13825724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.35210666 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Historically, papers have been physically bound to the journal in which they were published; but in the digital age papers are available individually, no longer tied to their respective journals. Hence, papers now can be read and cited based on their own merits, independently of the journal's physical availability, reputation, or impact factor (IF). We compare the strength of the relationship between journals' IFs and the actual citations received by their respective papers from 1902 to 2009. Throughout most of the 20th century, papers' citation rates were increasingly linked to their respective journals' IFs. However, since 1990, the advent of the digital age, the relation between IFs and paper citations has been weakening. This began first in physics, a field that was quick to make the transition into the electronic domain. Furthermore, since 1990 the overall proportion of highly cited papers coming from highly cited journals has been decreasing and, of these highly cited papers, the proportion not coming from highly cited journals has been increasing. Should this pattern continue, it might bring an end to the use of the IF as a way to evaluate the quality of journals, papers, and researchers.
  4. Kirchik, O.; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993-2010) (2012) 0.00
    0.0012923657 = product of:
      0.012923657 = sum of:
        0.012923657 = product of:
          0.03877097 = sum of:
            0.03877097 = weight(_text_:2010 in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03877097 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14672957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03067635 = queryNorm
                0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)