Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Glänzel, W."
  • × author_ss:"Janssens, F."
  1. Janssens, F.; Leta, J.; Glänzel, W.; Moor, B. de: Towards mapping library and information science (2006) 0.04
    0.043012477 = sum of:
      0.01794036 = product of:
        0.07176144 = sum of:
          0.07176144 = weight(_text_:authors in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07176144 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025072116 = product of:
        0.050144233 = sum of:
          0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050144233 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In an earlier study by the authors, full-text analysis and traditional bibliometric methods were combined to map research papers published in the journal Scientometrics. The main objective was to develop appropriate techniques of full-text analysis and to improve the efficiency of the individual methods in the mapping of science. The number of papers was, however, rather limited. In the present study, we extend the quantitative linguistic part of the previous studies to a set of five journals representing the field of Library and Information Science (LIS). Almost 1000 articles and notes published in the period 2002-2004 have been selected for this exercise. The optimum solution for clustering LIS is found for six clusters. The combination of different mapping techniques, applied to the full text of scientific publications, results in a characteristic tripod pattern. Besides two clusters in bibliometrics, one cluster in information retrieval and one containing general issues, webometrics and patent studies are identified as small but emerging clusters within LIS. The study is concluded with the analysis of cluster representations by the selected journals.
  2. Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010) 0.01
    0.012536058 = product of:
      0.025072116 = sum of:
        0.025072116 = product of:
          0.050144233 = sum of:
            0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050144233 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05208721 = queryNorm
                0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)