Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.021876944 = product of:
  0.1968925 = sum of:
    0.1968925 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 1801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1968925 = score(doc=1801,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02940506 = queryNorm
        0.8601141 = fieldWeight in 1801, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1801)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Abstract

Benutzerfreundlichkeit und komplexe Funktionalität sollten bei modernen relationalen Datenbanken kein Widerspruch mehr sein. Allerdings schaffen nur wenige Hersteller diese Grätsche. Weit mehr Werkzeuge wenden sich an den spezialisierten Profi

0.0026559862 = product of:
  0.023903877 = sum of:
    0.023903877 = product of:
      0.047807753 = sum of:
        0.047807753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047807753 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02940506 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

22. 8.1998 10:40:17