Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Glazier, J."
  1. Glazier, J.; Grover, R.: ¬A multidisciplinary framework for theory building (2002) 0.00 
    0.0019901397 = product of:
  0.009950698 = sum of:
    0.009950698 = weight(_text_:a in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009950698 = score(doc=809,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In 1986, the authors proposed a taxonomy of theory for library and information studies research. The purpose of this paper is to propose a revised model for theory building, called Circuits of Theory, that includes both the taxonomy and the critical contextual modules researchers consider in their work. These modules surround the taxonomy and encompass the concepts of individual as well as social knowledge, both discovered and undiscovered. This work has been done not to replace the original taxonomy, but--as the title implies--to revise it in light of a broader vision.
    Type
    a
  2. DeHart, F.E.; Glazier, J.: Computer searching on PRECIS : an exploration of measuring comparative retrieval effectiveness (1984) 0.00 
    0.0015415556 = product of:
  0.007707778 = sum of:
    0.007707778 = weight(_text_:a in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007707778 = score(doc=828,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.049902063 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04327843 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Designing research on the retrieval effectiveness of computer searches on PRECIS compared with retrieval effectiveness of searches on other types of subject analysis used in computer-based information sources is a complex process. This paper explores the complexity of measuring comparative retrieval effectiveness through a comparison of the subject analysis provided by the PRECIS system for fifty articles with the subject analysis provided for the same articles by three computer-based information sources: ERIC/CIJE, LLBA/Online and PsycINFO. Objectives are: (1) to discover factors that should be taken into account when designing this type of research; and (2) to identify extraneous variables that work against internal validity in research design .
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Themes