-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.04
0.03697917 = product of:
0.055468753 = sum of:
0.031063346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031063346 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.024405405 = product of:
0.04881081 = sum of:
0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04881081 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006)
0.02
0.017934434 = product of:
0.0538033 = sum of:
0.0538033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0538033 = score(doc=534,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018)
0.01
0.010846846 = product of:
0.032540537 = sum of:
0.032540537 = product of:
0.065081075 = sum of:
0.065081075 = weight(_text_:conference in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065081075 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.3351522 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.01
0.006938421 = product of:
0.020815263 = sum of:
0.020815263 = product of:
0.041630525 = sum of:
0.041630525 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041630525 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17933317 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
-
Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006)
0.01
0.006779279 = product of:
0.020337837 = sum of:
0.020337837 = product of:
0.040675674 = sum of:
0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040675674 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
-
Gnoli, C.: Metadata about what? : distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization (2012)
0.01
0.006779279 = product of:
0.020337837 = sum of:
0.020337837 = product of:
0.040675674 = sum of:
0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040675674 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211275 = queryNorm
0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Beitrag aus: Selected Papers from the 8th ISKO-France Conference, 27-28 June 2011, Lille, Université Charles-De-Gaulle Lille 3. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_4_d.pdf.
