Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004) 0.04
    0.03697917 = product of:
      0.055468753 = sum of:
        0.031063346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031063346 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
        0.024405405 = product of:
          0.04881081 = sum of:
            0.04881081 = weight(_text_:conference in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04881081 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.25136417 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  2. Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006) 0.02
    0.017934434 = product of:
      0.0538033 = sum of:
        0.0538033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0538033 = score(doc=534,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15490976 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051211275 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Szostak, R.; Gnoli, C.: Classifying by phenomena, theories and methods : examples with focused social science theories (2008) 0.01
    0.009490991 = product of:
      0.028472973 = sum of:
        0.028472973 = product of:
          0.056945946 = sum of:
            0.056945946 = weight(_text_:conference in 2250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056945946 = score(doc=2250,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.2932582 = fieldWeight in 2250, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2250)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  4. Gnoli, C.; Szostak, R.: ¬The Leon Manifesto (2007) 0.01
    0.006779279 = product of:
      0.020337837 = sum of:
        0.020337837 = product of:
          0.040675674 = sum of:
            0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040675674 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Some relevant proposals regarding the future of knowledge organization emerged during the 8th conference of the ISKO Spanish chapter, which took place in the beautiful, lively atmosphere of the town of León, between 18 and 20 of April 2007. These proposals are here labeled as "the Leon manifesto", and can be summarized in the following points: - the current trend towards an increasing interdisciplinarity of knowledge calls for essentially new knowledge organization systems (KOS), based on a substantive revision of the principles underlying the traditional discipline-based KOS; - this innovation is not only desirable, but also feasible, and should be implemented by actually developing some new KOS; instead of disciplines, the basic unity of the new KOS should be phenomena of the real world as it is represented in human knowledge; - the new KOS should allow users to shift from one perspective or viewpoint to another, thus reflecting the multidimensional nature of complex thought. In particular, it should allow them to search independently for particular phenomena, for particular theories about phenomena (and about relations between phenomena), and for particular methods of investigation; - the connections between phenomena, those between phenomena and the theories studying them, and those between phenomena and the methods to investigate them, can be expressed and managed by analytico-synthetic techniques already developed in faceted classification.
  5. Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.006779279 = product of:
      0.020337837 = sum of:
        0.020337837 = product of:
          0.040675674 = sum of:
            0.040675674 = weight(_text_:conference in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040675674 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19418365 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051211275 = queryNorm
                0.20947012 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7918143 = idf(docFreq=2710, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch