Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Gnoli, C.; Ledl, A.; Park, Z.; Trzmielewski, M.: Phenomenon-based vs. disciplinary classification : possibilities for evaluating and for mapping (2018) 0.02
    0.018251216 = product of:
      0.036502432 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = product of:
          0.073004864 = sum of:
            0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073004864 = score(doc=4804,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  2. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.010566111 = product of:
      0.021132221 = sum of:
        0.021132221 = product of:
          0.042264443 = sum of:
            0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042264443 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  3. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : Part 2: Types and levels (2017) 0.01
    0.008953625 = product of:
      0.01790725 = sum of:
        0.01790725 = product of:
          0.071629 = sum of:
            0.071629 = weight(_text_:authors in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071629 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    After making the case that phenomena can be the primary unit of classification (Part 1), some basic principles to group and sort phenomena are considered. Entities can be grouped together on the basis of both their similarity (morphology) and their common origin (phylogeny). The resulting groups will form the classical hierarchical chains of types and subtypes. At every hierarchical degree, phenomena can form ordered sets (arrays), where their sorting can reflect levels of increasing organization, corresponding to an evolutionary order of appearance (emergence). The theory of levels of reality has been investigated by many philosophers and applied to knowledge organization systems by various authors, which are briefly reviewed. At the broadest degree, it allows to identify some major strata of phenomena (forms, matter, life, minds, societies and culture) in turn divided into layers. A list of twenty-six layers is proposed to form the main classes of the Integrative Levels Classification system. A combination of morphology and phylogeny can determine whether a given phenomenon should be a type of an existing level, or a level on its own.