Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0315465 = product of:
  0.126186 = sum of:
    0.126186 = weight(_text_:steps in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.126186 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37724492 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.33449355 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowledge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question. A sounder foundation can be provided by an analysis of the different dimensions concurring to form the content of any knowledge item-what Brian Vickery described as the steps "from the world to the classifier." The ultimate referents of documents are the phenomena of the real world, that can be ordered by ontology, the study of what exists. Phenomena coexist in subjects with the perspectives by which they are considered, pertaining to epistemology, and with the formal features of knowledge carriers, adding a further, pragmatic layer. All these dimensions can be accounted for in metadata, but are often done so in mixed ways, making indexes less rigorous and interoperable. For example, while facet analysis was originally developed for subject indexing, many "faceted" interfaces today mix subject facets with form facets, and schemes presented as "ontologies" for the "semantic Web" also code for non-semantic information. In bibliographic classifications, phenomena are often confused with the disciplines dealing with them, the latter being assumed to be the most useful starting point, for users will have either one or another perspective. A general citation order of dimensions- phenomena, perspective, carrier-is recommended, helping to concentrate most relevant information at the beginning of headings.

0.0315465 = product of:
  0.126186 = sum of:
    0.126186 = weight(_text_:steps in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.126186 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37724492 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.33449355 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Purpose The Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) is a comprehensive "freely faceted" knowledge organization system not previously expressed as SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System). This paper reports and reflects on work converting the ILC to SKOS representation. Design/methodology/approach The design of the ILC representation and the various steps in the conversion to SKOS are described and located within the context of previous work considering the representation of complex classification schemes in SKOS. Various issues and trade-offs emerging from the conversion are discussed. The conversion implementation employed the STELETO transformation tool. Findings The ILC conversion captures some of the ILC facet structure by a limited extension beyond the SKOS standard. SPARQL examples illustrate how this extension could be used to create faceted, compound descriptors when indexing or cataloguing. Basic query patterns are provided that might underpin search systems. Possible routes for reducing complexity are discussed. Originality/value Complex classification schemes, such as the ILC, have features which are not straight forward to represent in SKOS and which extend beyond the functionality of the SKOS standard. The ILC's facet indicators are modelled as rdf:Property sub-hierarchies that accompany the SKOS RDF statements. The ILC's top-level fundamental facet relationships are modelled by extensions of the associative relationship - specialised sub-properties of skos:related. An approach for representing faceted compound descriptions in ILC and other faceted classification schemes is proposed.

0.0126618445 = product of:
  0.050647378 = sum of:
    0.050647378 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050647378 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21817535 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.0126618445 = product of:
  0.050647378 = sum of:
    0.050647378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050647378 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21817535 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.

0.0126618445 = product of:
  0.050647378 = sum of:
    0.050647378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050647378 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21817535 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

17. 2.2018 18:22:25

0.010551537 = product of:
  0.04220615 = sum of:
    0.04220615 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04220615 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21817535 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2010 20:40:08

0.010551537 = product of:
  0.04220615 = sum of:
    0.04220615 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04220615 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21817535 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062303245 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly