Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Goldstein, M.L."
  • × author_ss:"Morris, S.A."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Morris, S.A.; Goldstein, M.L.: Manifestation of research teams in journal literature : a growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka's law (2007) 0.00
    0.0031642143 = product of:
      0.0063284286 = sum of:
        0.0063284286 = product of:
          0.012656857 = sum of:
            0.012656857 = weight(_text_:a in 594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012656857 = score(doc=594,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.23833402 = fieldWeight in 594, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=594)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces a team-based model of researchers in a specialty and investigates the manifestation of such teams in a specialty's literature. The proposed qualitative behavioral model, with its mathematical expression as a growth model, is significant because it simultaneously describes the two phenomena of collaboration and author productivity (Lotka's law) in a specialty. The model is nested: A team process models the creation of research teams and the success-breeds-success process of their production of articles, while at a lower level the productivity of authors within teams is also modeled as a success-breeds-success process. Interteam collaboration (weak ties) is modeled as random events. This simple growth model is shown to faithfully mimic six network metrics of bipartite article-author networks. The model is demonstrated on three example article collections from specialties that have a wide range of degree of collaboration: (a) a distance education collection with low collaboration degree, (b) a complex networks collection with typical collaboration degree, and (c) an atrial ablation collection with heavy collaboration degree.
    Type
    a