Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Golub, K."
  • × author_ss:"Moon, J."
  1. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.04 
    0.037817482 = sum of:
  0.020806778 = product of:
    0.08322711 = sum of:
      0.08322711 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08322711 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2360532 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.017010704 = product of:
    0.05103211 = sum of:
      0.05103211 = weight(_text_:k in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05103211 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05177952 = queryNorm
          0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
  2. Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010) 0.01 
    0.006075251 = product of:
  0.012150502 = sum of:
    0.012150502 = product of:
      0.036451504 = sum of:
        0.036451504 = weight(_text_:k in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036451504 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1848414 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05177952 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes