Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.012625597 = product of:
  0.025251195 = sum of:
    0.025251195 = product of:
      0.05050239 = sum of:
        0.05050239 = weight(_text_:b in 1104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05050239 = score(doc=1104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1104)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.012625597 = product of:
  0.025251195 = sum of:
    0.025251195 = product of:
      0.05050239 = sum of:
        0.05050239 = weight(_text_:b in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05050239 = score(doc=1145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.31315655 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.0063127987 = product of:
  0.012625597 = sum of:
    0.012625597 = product of:
      0.025251195 = sum of:
        0.025251195 = weight(_text_:b in 2684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025251195 = score(doc=2684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16126883 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045518078 = queryNorm
            0.15657827 = fieldWeight in 2684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For centuries, there have been few doubts about the validity and the nature of the principles that put together knowledge, texts, documents, disciplinary subject matters and the respective literature. Kochen, in the sixties, declared that literature organizes knowledge as knowledge organizes the state of affairs in the world. And, regardless of how information classification and indexation will be defined, they did not intend to interfere, through their technical-intellectual operations and tools, into the canons that rule specific knowledge. On the contrary, the more perfect the reversibility and neutrality of the documentary operation, the greater the effectiveness of its intervention. In the late nineteenth century, however, the premises that assured the universality of knowledge organization principles were not so trustworthy as they used to be. Similarly, later on, the conventional and selective character of documentary operations was acknowledged. But only in more recent decades, previous forms of linkage among subjects, knowledge, discourses, and documents have experienced decisive changes. These transformations become more noticeable and intensive in the electronic communication networks: a) permitting the reversibility of roles, such as receiver-issuer, writer-reader, producer-consumer; b) rendering less stable and distinct the institutional patterns, actor identities and previous shared ontological premises. It is possible, anyway, that information links replaced, in the mediating networks, the social bonds of community and social actors embedded in a relatively autonomous and unificated field: a specialization or discipline, an economic activity, a local community? We can ask ourselves, in these contexts, about the conditions of "informational seeking" at the new environments, when cross-retrieval and seeking situations are incremented. Selective process and decision making about the informativity of a source, text or document, presumed a judgement of values, whose parameters and criterions of selection and adherence must change in different contexts of action. Information domains are embedded in the life world of sense production. This "world of life", an original space of sense making, is the meeting place where are submitted, as decision making instance, dissidents and alternatives practices and discourses. In these conditions of arbitration space, a "life world" is a nearly transcendental level, where the speakers and the hearer put in common claims of validations. This arbitration sphere is not only a source of legitimization, but also a framework of building collectives "programs of actions".