Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gopinath, M.A."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Gopinath, M.A.; Reddy, D.S.: Comparative study of the theoretical basis of mass communication and information science (1993) 0.01 
    0.010007498 = product of:
  0.025018744 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 7570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=7570,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7570, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7570)
    0.014120899 = product of:
      0.028241798 = sum of:
        0.028241798 = weight(_text_:information in 7570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028241798 = score(doc=7570,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 7570, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7570)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Delineates the difference between mass communication and information science. Establishes the theoretical models which present a framework for mass communication. Presents the inter-relationships existing between mass communication studies and information science in the form of a table. Also shows how the two can work together for an information conscious society
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation. 30(1993) no.4, S.129-138
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a
  2. Gopinath, M.A.; Das, P.: Classification and representation of knowledge (1997) 0.01 
    0.0074575767 = product of:
  0.018643942 = sum of:
    0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00770594 = score(doc=462,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
    0.010938003 = product of:
      0.021876005 = sum of:
        0.021876005 = weight(_text_:information in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021876005 = score(doc=462,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Discusses the various purposes of knowledge representation including the understanding of texts, cognitive research, expert system development and information retrieval. Analyses the relationship of classification to knowledge, including the role of cluster analysis. Examines the problems of knowledge representation and the solution offered through proper classification
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 34(1997) no.2, S.85-90
    Theme
    Information
    Type
    a

Authors