Gorman, M.: Why teach cataloguing and classification? (2002)
0.04
0.0397216 = product of:
0.0794432 = sum of:
0.0794432 = product of:
0.1588864 = sum of:
0.1588864 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1588864 = score(doc=5446,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20397975 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.051756795 = queryNorm
0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 5446, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5446)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Enemies of cataloging today include ill-informed administrators, information scientists in library schools, and those who think that alternatives to vocabulary control and bibliographic architecture-such as Google-are better and cheaper than cataloging. Bibliographic control and cataloging should be at the heart of library education. An ideal library school is described.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 34(2002) nos.1/2, S.1-14
