Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gorraiz, J."
  • × author_ss:"Schlögl, C."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.; Bart, C.; Bargmann, M.: Messen und gemessen werden : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen quantitativer Forschungsevaluierungen am Beispiel eines Institutsvergleichs (2001) 0.02
    0.023002025 = product of:
      0.04600405 = sum of:
        0.04600405 = product of:
          0.06900607 = sum of:
            0.050486468 = weight(_text_:c in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050486468 = score(doc=5958,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.32338172 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=5958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.4, S.221-228
  2. Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.: Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten? : Ein Vergleich von Download- und Zitationsidikatoren (2012) 0.02
    0.02108514 = product of:
      0.04217028 = sum of:
        0.04217028 = product of:
          0.063255414 = sum of:
            0.041649207 = weight(_text_:c in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041649207 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
            0.021606207 = weight(_text_:h in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021606207 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 59(2012) H.2, S.87-95
  3. Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.02
    0.018072978 = product of:
      0.036145955 = sum of:
        0.036145955 = product of:
          0.05421893 = sum of:
            0.035699323 = weight(_text_:c in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035699323 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15612034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
            0.018519606 = weight(_text_:h in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018519606 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11244635 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045260075 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.3, S.131-140