-
Torres-Salinas, D.; Gorraiz, J.; Robinson-Garcia, N.: ¬The insoluble problems of books : what does Altmetric.com have to offer? (2018)
0.07
0.06683056 = sum of:
0.02974005 = product of:
0.1189602 = sum of:
0.1189602 = weight(_text_:authors in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1189602 = score(doc=4633,freq=12.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.49350607 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03709051 = sum of:
0.008434726 = weight(_text_:d in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008434726 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
0.028655786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028655786 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the capabilities, functionalities and appropriateness of Altmetric.com as a data source for the bibliometric analysis of books in comparison to PlumX. Design/methodology/approach The authors perform an exploratory analysis on the metrics the Altmetric Explorer for Institutions, platform offers for books. The authors use two distinct data sets of books. On the one hand, the authors analyze the Book Collection included in Altmetric.com. On the other hand, the authors use Clarivate's Master Book List, to analyze Altmetric.com's capabilities to download and merge data with external databases. Finally, the authors compare the findings with those obtained in a previous study performed in PlumX. Findings Altmetric.com combines and orderly tracks a set of data sources combined by DOI identifiers to retrieve metadata from books, being Google Books its main provider. It also retrieves information from commercial publishers and from some Open Access initiatives, including those led by university libraries, such as Harvard Library. We find issues with linkages between records and mentions or ISBN discrepancies. Furthermore, the authors find that automatic bots affect greatly Wikipedia mentions to books. The comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools. Practical implications This study targets different audience which can benefit from the findings. First, bibliometricians and researchers who seek for alternative sources to develop bibliometric analyses of books, with a special focus on the Social Sciences and Humanities fields. Second, librarians and research managers who are the main clients to which these tools are directed. Third, Altmetric.com itself as well as other altmetric providers who might get a better understanding of the limitations users encounter and improve this promising tool. Originality/value This is the first study to analyze Altmetric.com's functionalities and capabilities for providing metric data for books and to compare results from this platform, with those obtained via PlumX.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003)
0.00
0.0044731894 = product of:
0.008946379 = sum of:
0.008946379 = product of:
0.017892757 = sum of:
0.017892757 = weight(_text_:d in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017892757 = score(doc=718,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.178113 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
- Location
- D
-
Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.: Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten? : Ein Vergleich von Download- und Zitationsidikatoren (2012)
0.00
0.0036901925 = product of:
0.007380385 = sum of:
0.007380385 = product of:
0.01476077 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
-
Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.; Bart, C.; Bargmann, M.: Messen und gemessen werden : Möglichkeiten und Grenzen quantitativer Forschungsevaluierungen am Beispiel eines Institutsvergleichs (2001)
0.00
0.0031630222 = product of:
0.0063260444 = sum of:
0.0063260444 = product of:
0.012652089 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=5958,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- d
