Koth, M.; Green, L.G.: Workflow considerations in retrospective conversion projects for scores (1992)
0.02
0.023290861 = product of:
0.046581723 = sum of:
0.046581723 = product of:
0.093163446 = sum of:
0.093163446 = weight(_text_:headings in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093163446 = score(doc=531,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211677 = queryNorm
0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Complexities of music materials and the uniform titles and subject headings for them make score retrospective conversion an expensive and time-demanding venture. Careful pre-recon planning and workflow development are therefore important in score recon projects. The workflows from seven score recon projects with details of staffing levels and perceived advantages and disadvantages are presented. Pre-recon considerations-source of cataloging information, what to convert, in what order to convert, the level of staffing, and the issue of when and how to do authority work-are discussed in relation to the seven workflows.
