-
Green, R.: Attribution and relationality (1998)
0.01
0.012264134 = product of:
0.049056537 = sum of:
0.049056537 = product of:
0.098113075 = sum of:
0.098113075 = weight(_text_:organization in 6425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098113075 = score(doc=6425,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5458315 = fieldWeight in 6425, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper examines the role of attributes within entity-relationship-based conceptual modeling, investigating the interplay between attributes and relationships within (1) data modeling and (2) natural language use. Attribution is found to be an important relationship type. The lack of distinctiveness between attributes and relationships leads to a re-examination of how hierarchy should be treated in both the practice and theory of knowledge organization
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
-
Green, R.: Insights into classification from the cognitive sciences : ramifications for index languages (1992)
0.01
0.010621051 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = product of:
0.08496841 = sum of:
0.08496841 = weight(_text_:organization in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08496841 = score(doc=2104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Green, R.: ¬The profession's models of information : a cognitive linguistic analysis (1991)
0.01
0.009634215 = product of:
0.03853686 = sum of:
0.03853686 = weight(_text_:information in 2724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03853686 = score(doc=2724,freq=28.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.4354273 = fieldWeight in 2724, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2724)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This study establishes 3 predominant cognitive models of information and the information transfer process manifest in the literature of library and information science, based on a linguistic analysis of phrases incoporating the word 'information' from a random sample of abstracts in the LISA database. The direct communication (DC) and indirect communication (IC) models (drawn from Reddy's frameworks of metalinguistic usage) adopt the perspective of the information system; the information-seeking (IS) model takes the viewpoint of the information user. 2 disturbing findings are presented: 1. core elements of the DC and IC models are more weakly supported by the data than are most of the peripheral elements; and 2. even though the IS model presents the information user's perspective, the data emphasise the role of the information system. These findings suggest respectively that the field lacks a coherent model of information transfer per se and that our model of information retrieval is mechanistic, oblivious to the cognitive models of end users
- Footnote
- Enthält eine umfangreiche Liste von Redewendungen mit 'Information'
- Theme
- Information
-
Green, R.: Description in the electronic environment (1996)
0.01
0.00876192 = product of:
0.03504768 = sum of:
0.03504768 = product of:
0.07009536 = sum of:
0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07009536 = score(doc=3685,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
- Source
- Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
-
Green, R.: Development of a relational thesaurus (1996)
0.01
0.00876192 = product of:
0.03504768 = sum of:
0.03504768 = product of:
0.07009536 = sum of:
0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 5159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07009536 = score(doc=5159,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 5159, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.5
- Source
- Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
-
Green, R.: ¬The expression of syntagmatic relationships in indexing : are frame-based index languages the answer? (1992)
0.01
0.0070807007 = product of:
0.028322803 = sum of:
0.028322803 = product of:
0.056645606 = sum of:
0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056645606 = score(doc=2093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Green, R.: ¬The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities (1997)
0.01
0.0053105257 = product of:
0.021242103 = sum of:
0.021242103 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 24(1997) no.2, S.72-83
-
Green, R.: ¬The design of a relational database for large-scale bibliographic retrieval (1996)
0.00
0.0036413912 = product of:
0.014565565 = sum of:
0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 7712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014565565 = score(doc=7712,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 7712, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7712)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study, conducted by Maryland University, College of Library and Information Services, to establish the basic logical design of large scale bibliographic databases using the entity relationship (ER) model, with a view to the eventual conversion of the ER based conceptual schemas into relational databases. A fully normalized relational bibliographic database promises relief from the update, insertion, and deletion anomalies that plague bibliographic databases using MARC formats and USMARC formats internally. Presents the conceptual design of a full scale bibliographic database (inclusing bibliographic, authority, holdings, and classification data), based on entity relationship modelling. This design translates easily into a logical relational design. Discusses the treatment of format integration and the differentiation between the intellectual and bibliographic levels of description and between collective and individual levels of description. Unfortunately, the complexities of bibliographic data result in a tension between the semantic integrity of the relatioal approach and the inefficiencies of normalization and decomposition. Outlines compromise approaches to the dilemma
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 15(1996) no.4, S.207-221
-
Green, R.: Syntagmatic relationships in index languages : a reassessment (1995)
0.00
0.0030039945 = product of:
0.012015978 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=3144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3144)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Effective use of syntagmatic relationships in index languages has suffered from inaccurate or incomplete characterization in both linguistics and information science. A number of 'myths' about syntagmatic relationships are debunked: the exclusivity of paradigmatic and syntagmatic relationships, linearity as a defining characteristic of syntagmatic relationships, the restriction of syntagmatic relationships to surface linguistic units, the limitation of syntagmatic relationship benefits in document retrieval to precision, and the general irrelevance of syntagmatic relationships for document retrieval. None of the mechanisms currently used with index languages is powerful enough to achieve the levels of precision and recall that the expression of conceptual syntagmatic relationships is in theory capable of. New designs for expressing these relationships in index languages will need to take into account such characteristics as their semantic nature, systematicity, generalizability and constituent nature
-
Green, R.: Topical relevance relationships : 1: why topic matching fails (1995)
0.00
0.0025748524 = product of:
0.01029941 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 3722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=3722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3722)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.9, S.646-653
-
Green, R.: Topical relevance relationships : 2: an exploratory study and preliminary typology (1995)
0.00
0.0025748524 = product of:
0.01029941 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46(1995) no.9, S.654-662
-
Green, R.: ¬The role of relational structures in indexing for the humanities (1997)
0.00
0.0025748524 = product of:
0.01029941 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Information services and use. 17(1997) nos.2/3, S.85-100