-
Greenberg, J.: Intellectual control of visual archives : a comparison between the Art and Architecture Thesaurus and the Library of Congress Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (1993)
0.07
0.07297295 = product of:
0.21891886 = sum of:
0.022375738 = product of:
0.044751476 = sum of:
0.044751476 = weight(_text_:theory in 546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044751476 = score(doc=546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.19654313 = weight(_text_:graphic in 546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19654313 = score(doc=546,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25850594 = queryWeight, product of:
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.7603041 = fieldWeight in 546, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=546)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The following investigation is a comparison between the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) and the LC Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (LCTGM), two popular sources for providing subject access to visual archives. The analysis begins with a discussion on the nature of visual archives and the employment of archival control theory to graphic materials. The major difference observed is that the AAT is a faceted structure geared towards a specialized audience of art and architecture researchers, while LCTGM is similar to LCSH in structure and aims to service the wide-spread archival community. The conclusion recognizes the need to understand the differences between subject thesauri and subject heading lists, and the pressing need to investigate and understand intellectual control of visual archives in today's automated environment.
-
Greenberg, J.: Optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods with semantically encoded structured thesaurus terminology (2001)
0.02
0.015196927 = product of:
0.04559078 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=5750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.029578956 = product of:
0.05915791 = sum of:
0.05915791 = weight(_text_:methods in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05915791 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- While researchers have explored the value of structured thesauri as controlled vocabularies for general information retrieval (IR) activities, they have not identified the optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods for taking advantage of the semantic encoding underlying the terminology in these tools. The study reported on in this article addresses this question, and examined whether QE via semantically encoded thesauri terminology is more effective in the automatic or interactive processing environment. The research found that, regardless of end-users' retrieval goals, synonyms and partial synonyms (SYNs) and narrower terms (NTs) are generally good candidates for automatic QE and that related (RTs) are better candidates for interactive QE. The study also examined end-users' selection of semantically encoded thesauri terms for interactive QE, and explored how retrieval goals and QE processes may be combined in future thesauri-supported IR systems
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:00:11
-
Greenberg, J.; Murillo, A.; Ogletree, A.; Boyles, R.; Martin, N.; Romeo, C.: Metadata capital : automating metadata workflows in the NIEHS viral vector core laboratory (2014)
0.01
0.012309102 = product of:
0.036927305 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=1566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.020915478 = product of:
0.041830957 = sum of:
0.041830957 = weight(_text_:methods in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041830957 = score(doc=1566,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.26651827 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This paper presents research examining metadata capital in the context of the Viral Vector Core Laboratory at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Methods include collaborative workflow modeling and a metadata analysis. Models of the laboratory's workflow and metadata activity are generated to identify potential opportunities for defining microservices that may be supported by iRODS rules. Generic iRODS rules are also shared along with images of the iRODS prototype. The discussion includes an exploration of a modified capital sigma equation to understand metadata as an asset. The work aims to raise awareness of metadata as an asset and to incentivize investment in metadata R&D.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Crystal, A.; Greenberg, J.: Relevance criteria identified by health information users during Web searches (2006)
0.01
0.010257586 = product of:
0.030772757 = sum of:
0.01334319 = product of:
0.02668638 = sum of:
0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02668638 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.017429566 = product of:
0.034859132 = sum of:
0.034859132 = weight(_text_:methods in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034859132 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- This article focuses on the relevance judgments made by health information users who use the Web. Health information users were conceptualized as motivated information users concerned about how an environmental issue affects their health. Users identified their own environmental health interests and conducted a Web search of a particular environmental health Web site. Users were asked to identify (by highlighting with a mouse) the criteria they use to assess relevance in both Web search engine surrogates and full-text Web documents. Content analysis of document criteria highlighted by users identified the criteria these users relied on most often. Key criteria identified included (in order of frequency of appearance) research, topic, scope, data, influence, affiliation, Web characteristics, and authority/ person. A power-law distribution of criteria was observed (a few criteria represented most of the highlighted regions, with a long tail of occasionally used criteria). Implications of this work are that information retrieval (IR) systems should be tailored in terms of users' tendencies to rely on certain document criteria, and that relevance research should combine methods to gather richer, contextualized data. Metadata for IR systems, such as that used in search engine surrogates, could be improved by taking into account actual usage of relevance criteria. Such metadata should be user-centered (based on data from users, as in this study) and contextappropriate (fit to users' situations and tasks).
- Date
- 18. 8.2006 13:29:36
-
Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.; White, H.: Analysis and synthesis of metadata goals for scientific data (2012)
0.01
0.00817406 = product of:
0.04904436 = sum of:
0.04904436 = sum of:
0.027887305 = weight(_text_:methods in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027887305 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15695344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.17767884 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021157054 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The proliferation of discipline-specific metadata schemes contributes to artificial barriers that can impede interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. The authors considered this problem by examining the domains, objectives, and architectures of nine metadata schemes used to document scientific data in the physical, life, and social sciences. They used a mixed-methods content analysis and Greenberg's () metadata objectives, principles, domains, and architectural layout (MODAL) framework, and derived 22 metadata-related goals from textual content describing each metadata scheme. Relationships are identified between the domains (e.g., scientific discipline and type of data) and the categories of scheme objectives. For each strong correlation (>0.6), a Fisher's exact test for nonparametric data was used to determine significance (p < .05). Significant relationships were found between the domains and objectives of the schemes. Schemes describing observational data are more likely to have "scheme harmonization" (compatibility and interoperability with related schemes) as an objective; schemes with the objective "abstraction" (a conceptual model exists separate from the technical implementation) also have the objective "sufficiency" (the scheme defines a minimal amount of information to meet the needs of the community); and schemes with the objective "data publication" do not have the objective "element refinement." The analysis indicates that many metadata-driven goals expressed by communities are independent of scientific discipline or the type of data, although they are constrained by historical community practices and workflows as well as the technological environment at the time of scheme creation. The analysis reveals 11 fundamental metadata goals for metadata documenting scientific data in support of sharing research data across disciplines and domains. The authors report these results and highlight the need for more metadata-related research, particularly in the context of recent funding agency policy changes.
-
Greenberg, J.: Theoretical considerations of lifecycle modeling : an analysis of the Dryad Repository demonstrating automatic metadata propagation, inheritance, and value system adoption (2009)
0.00
0.00439501 = product of:
0.02637006 = sum of:
0.02637006 = product of:
0.05274012 = sum of:
0.05274012 = weight(_text_:theory in 2990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05274012 = score(doc=2990,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 2990, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2990)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The Dryad repository is for data supporting published research in the field of evolutionary biology and related disciplines. Dryad development team members seek a theoretical framework to aid communication about metadata issues and plans. This article explores lifecycle modeling as a theoretical framework for understanding metadata in the repostiroy enivornment. A background discussion reviews the importance of theory, the status of a metadata theory, and lifecycle concepts. An analysis draws examples from the Dryad repository demonstrating automatic propagation, metadata inheritance, and value system adoption, and reports results from a faceted term mapping experiment that included 12 vocabularies and approximately 600 terms. The article also reports selected key findings from a recent survey on the data-sharing attitudes and behaviors of nearly 400 evolutionary biologists. Te results confirm the applicability of lifecycle modeling to Dryad's metadata infrastructure. The article concludes that lifecycle modeling provides a theoretical framework that can enhance our understanding of metadata, aid communication about the topic of metadata in the repository environment, and potentially help sustain robust repository development.
-
Greenberg, J.: Reference structures : stagnation, progress, and future challenges (1997)
0.00
0.0043508383 = product of:
0.026105028 = sum of:
0.026105028 = product of:
0.052210055 = sum of:
0.052210055 = weight(_text_:theory in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052210055 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16234003 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Assesses the current state of reference structures in OPACs in a framework defined by stagnation, progress, and future challenges. 'Stagnation' referes to the limited and inconsistent reference structure access provided in current OPACs. 'Progress' refers to improved OPAC reference structure access and reference structure possibilities that extend beyond those commonly represented in existing subject autgority control tools. The progress discussion is supported by a look at professional committee work, data modelling ideas, ontological theory, and one area of linguistic research. The discussion ends with a list of 6 areas needing attention if reference structure access is to be improved in the future OPAC environment
-
Greenberg, J.: Metadata generation : processes, people and tools (2003)
0.00
0.003558184 = product of:
0.021349104 = sum of:
0.021349104 = product of:
0.04269821 = sum of:
0.04269821 = weight(_text_:29 in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04269821 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.16-19
-
Greenberg, J.: ¬A quantitative categorical analysis of metadata elements in image-applicable metadata schemes (2001)
0.00
0.003113411 = product of:
0.018680464 = sum of:
0.018680464 = product of:
0.03736093 = sum of:
0.03736093 = weight(_text_:29 in 6529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03736093 = score(doc=6529,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 6529, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6529)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 18:42:27
-
White, H.C.; Carrier, S.; Thompson, A.; Greenberg, J.; Scherle, R.: ¬The Dryad Data Repository : a Singapore framework metadata architecture in a DSpace environment (2008)
0.00
0.0030854037 = product of:
0.018512422 = sum of:
0.018512422 = product of:
0.037024844 = sum of:
0.037024844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037024844 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Greenberg, J.: Understanding metadata and metadata scheme (2005)
0.00
0.0026686378 = product of:
0.016011827 = sum of:
0.016011827 = product of:
0.032023653 = sum of:
0.032023653 = weight(_text_:29 in 5725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032023653 = score(doc=5725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5725)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:11:00
-
Greenberg, J.: Automatic query expansion via lexical-semantic relationships (2001)
0.00
0.0022238651 = product of:
0.01334319 = sum of:
0.01334319 = product of:
0.02668638 = sum of:
0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02668638 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 13:59:48
-
Greenberg, J.; Mayer-Patel, K.; Trujillo, S.: YouTube: applying FRBR and exploring the multiple description coding compression model (2012)
0.00
0.0022238651 = product of:
0.01334319 = sum of:
0.01334319 = product of:
0.02668638 = sum of:
0.02668638 = weight(_text_:29 in 1930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02668638 = score(doc=1930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13732746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 10:53:13
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.00
0.0022038599 = product of:
0.013223159 = sum of:
0.013223159 = product of:
0.026446318 = sum of:
0.026446318 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026446318 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
-
Shoffner, M.; Greenberg, J.; Kramer-Duffield, J.; Woodbury, D.: Web 2.0 semantic systems : collaborative learning in science (2008)
0.00
0.0017630879 = product of:
0.010578527 = sum of:
0.010578527 = product of:
0.021157054 = sum of:
0.021157054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021157054 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1367084 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03903913 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
