Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Greifeneder, E."
  1. Pontis, S.; Blandford, A.; Greifeneder, E.; Attalla, H.; Neal, D.: Keeping up to date : an academic researcher's information journey (2017) 0.02
    0.01974305 = product of:
      0.0394861 = sum of:
        0.0394861 = sum of:
          0.008285859 = weight(_text_:a in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.008285859 = score(doc=3340,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.03120024 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03120024 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Keeping up to date with research developments is a central activity of academic researchers, but researchers face difficulties in managing the rapid growth of available scientific information. This study examined how researchers stay up to date, using the information journey model as a framework for analysis and investigating which dimensions influence information behaviors. We designed a 2-round study involving semistructured interviews and prototype testing with 61 researchers with 3 levels of seniority (PhD student to professor). Data were analyzed following a semistructured qualitative approach. Five key dimensions that influence information behaviors were identified: level of seniority, information sources, state of the project, level of familiarity, and how well defined the relevant community is. These dimensions are interrelated and their values determine the flow of the information journey. Across all levels of professional expertise, researchers used similar hard (formal) sources to access content, while soft (interpersonal) sources were used to filter information. An important "pain point" that future information tools should address is helping researchers filter information at the point of need.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35
    Type
    a
  2. Greifeneder, E.: Hilfe auf allen Ebenen : ein Beitrag zur Forschung über Online-Hilfen in OPACs (2008) 0.01
    0.01383317 = product of:
      0.02766634 = sum of:
        0.02766634 = sum of:
          0.00270615 = weight(_text_:a in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.00270615 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
          0.02496019 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496019 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046056706 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 13:29:15
    Type
    a
  3. Greifeneder, E.: Online-Hilfen in OPACs : Analyse deutscher Universitäts-Onlinekataloge (2007) 0.01
    0.00780006 = product of:
      0.01560012 = sum of:
        0.01560012 = product of:
          0.03120024 = sum of:
            0.03120024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03120024 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 13:03:30
  4. Seadle, M.; Greifeneder, E.: Defining a digital library (2007) 0.00
    0.003926687 = product of:
      0.007853374 = sum of:
        0.007853374 = product of:
          0.015706748 = sum of:
            0.015706748 = weight(_text_:a in 2540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015706748 = score(doc=2540,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.29576474 = fieldWeight in 2540, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This editorial seeks to examine the definition of a "digital library" to see whether one can be constructed that usefully distinguishes a digital library from other types of electronic resources. Design/methodology/approach - The primary methodology compares definitions from multiple settings, including formal institutional settings, working definitions from articles, and a synthesis created in a seminar at Humboldt University in Berlin. Findings - At this point, digital libraries are evolving too fast for any lasting definition. Definitions that users readily understand are too broad and imprecise, and definitions with more technical precision quickly grow too obscure for common use. Originality/value - A functional definition of a digital library would add clarity to a burgeoning field, especially when trying to evaluate a resource. The student perspective provides a fresh look at the problem.
    Type
    a
  5. Greifeneder, E.: ¬The effects of distraction on task completion scores in a natural environment test setting (2016) 0.00
    0.0023919214 = product of:
      0.0047838427 = sum of:
        0.0047838427 = product of:
          0.009567685 = sum of:
            0.009567685 = weight(_text_:a in 3076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009567685 = score(doc=3076,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3076, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3076)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The effects of distraction on completion scores generate a gap that is generally not taken into account in information behavior studies. This research investigated what happens if researchers de facto allow distractions to occur in a test situation. It examined the type and magnitude of occurred distractions, the effects distractions have on completion scores, and whether different distractions affect different test activities differently. In the research design, participants were randomly assigned to either a controlled environment or their natural environment. The results showed that whereas participants in the natural environment needed more time to complete the post task questionnaire than their laboratory counterparts, they spent a similar amount of time on the tasks. Participants were capable of, and indeed willing to, limit the less-urgent distractions in the interests of getting the tasks done. If they were interrupted by a human contact, however, the completion time for tasks increased significantly. Previous studies showed that distractions change information behavior. Yet, the present results provide evidence that these changes do not always occur, and thus there needs to be a better demarcation of the limits within which distraction can be expected to change how people interact with information.
    Type
    a
  6. Davis, S.; Greifeneder, E.: When information sharing becomes an event : an example of Private-Public Film Screenings (2015) 0.00
    0.0011839407 = product of:
      0.0023678814 = sum of:
        0.0023678814 = product of:
          0.0047357627 = sum of:
            0.0047357627 = weight(_text_:a in 1741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047357627 = score(doc=1741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Schlebbe, K.; Greifeneder, E.: Information need, Informationsbedarf und -bedürfnis (2023) 0.00
    0.0010148063 = product of:
      0.0020296127 = sum of:
        0.0020296127 = product of:
          0.0040592253 = sum of:
            0.0040592253 = weight(_text_:a in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0040592253 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. Greifeneder, E.; Schlebbe, K.: Information Behaviour (2023) 0.00
    8.4567186E-4 = product of:
      0.0016913437 = sum of:
        0.0016913437 = product of:
          0.0033826875 = sum of:
            0.0033826875 = weight(_text_:a in 812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0033826875 = score(doc=812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a