Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0061918716 = product of:
  0.027863422 = sum of:
    0.020551153 = weight(_text_:access in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020551153 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
    0.0073122694 = product of:
      0.021936808 = sum of:
        0.021936808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021936808 = score(doc=1935,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

OPACs (Online Public Access Catalogues) sind heute meist der einzige Zugang zu den Beständen einer Bibliothek, doch zeigt die Praxis, dass viele Nutzer Probleme bei der Bedienung elektronischer Kataloge haben. Ein guter OPAC muss deshalb über ein durchdachtes Online-Hilfesystem verfügen. Die Arbeit leistet eine Bestandsaufnahme und kritische Diskussion der an deutschen Universitäts-OPACs implementierten Online-Hilfesysteme. Außer den verschiedenen Formen von Hilfetexten werden dabei auch Hilfen wie Rechtschreibkorrektur, Suchergebnisfilter und Recommender miteinbezogen. Grundlagen der Analyse sind zum einen eine funktionsbezogene Klassifikation der Hilfen, zum anderen die Einführung der Begriffe Effektivität und Effizienz, die als Parameter zur Bestimmung des Nutzens eines Hilfesystems dienen. Als Ergebnis der Untersuchung stellt die Autorin Prinzipien eines effizienten Hilfesystems vor. Das Buch richtet sich an Leser aus den Bereichen Bibliotheks- und Informationswesen sowie Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation.

Date

22. 6.2008 13:03:30

0.0061918716 = product of:
  0.027863422 = sum of:
    0.020551153 = weight(_text_:access in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020551153 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10975764 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03238235 = queryNorm
        0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
    0.0073122694 = product of:
      0.021936808 = sum of:
        0.021936808 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021936808 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)

Abstract

Keeping up to date with research developments is a central activity of academic researchers, but researchers face difficulties in managing the rapid growth of available scientific information. This study examined how researchers stay up to date, using the information journey model as a framework for analysis and investigating which dimensions influence information behaviors. We designed a 2-round study involving semistructured interviews and prototype testing with 61 researchers with 3 levels of seniority (PhD student to professor). Data were analyzed following a semistructured qualitative approach. Five key dimensions that influence information behaviors were identified: level of seniority, information sources, state of the project, level of familiarity, and how well defined the relevant community is. These dimensions are interrelated and their values determine the flow of the information journey. Across all levels of professional expertise, researchers used similar hard (formal) sources to access content, while soft (interpersonal) sources were used to filter information. An important "pain point" that future information tools should address is helping researchers filter information at the point of need.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.22-35

6.499795E-4 = product of:
  0.0058498154 = sum of:
    0.0058498154 = product of:
      0.017549446 = sum of:
        0.017549446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017549446 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11339747 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03238235 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)

Date

22. 6.2008 13:29:15