-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.03
0.025058959 = product of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.100235835 = sum of:
0.036221053 = weight(_text_:science in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036221053 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.06401478 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06401478 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.00
0.0038418232 = product of:
0.015367293 = sum of:
0.015367293 = product of:
0.030734586 = sum of:
0.030734586 = weight(_text_:science in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030734586 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012)
0.00
0.002716579 = product of:
0.010866316 = sum of:
0.010866316 = product of:
0.021732632 = sum of:
0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021732632 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1662-1665
-
Guns, R.: Tracing the origins of the semantic web (2013)
0.00
0.0022638158 = product of:
0.009055263 = sum of:
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=1093,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.2173-2181
-
Zuccala, A.; Guns, R.; Cornacchia, R.; Bod, R.: Can we rank scholarly book publishers? : a bibliometric experiment with the field of history (2015)
0.00
0.0022638158 = product of:
0.009055263 = sum of:
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1333-1347
-
Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018)
0.00
0.0022638158 = product of:
0.009055263 = sum of:
0.009055263 = product of:
0.018110527 = sum of:
0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018110527 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.047248192 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Aims to inform researchers about metrics so that they become aware of the evaluative techniques being applied to their scientific output. Understanding these concepts will help them during their funding initiatives, and in hiring and tenure. The book not only describes what indicators do (or are designed to do, which is not always the same thing), but also gives precise mathematical formulae so that indicators can be properly understood and evaluated. Metrics have become a critical issue in science, with widespread international discussion taking place on the subject across scientific journals and organizations. As researchers should know the publication-citation context, the mathematical formulae of indicators being used by evaluating committees and their consequences, and how such indicators might be misused, this book provides an ideal tome on the topic. Provides researchers with a detailed understanding of bibliometric indicators and their applications. Empowers researchers looking to understand the indicators relevant to their work and careers. Presents an informed and rounded picture of bibliometrics, including the strengths and shortcomings of particular indicators. Supplies the mathematics behind bibliometric indicators so they can be properly understood. Written by authors with longstanding expertise who are considered global leaders in the field of bibliometrics
