Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Guns, R."
  1. Guns, R.: Tracing the origins of the semantic web (2013) 0.04 
    0.03649048 = product of:
  0.07298096 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=1093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
    0.06317951 = weight(_text_:standards in 1093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06317951 = score(doc=1093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25660375 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 1093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1093)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The Semantic Web has been criticized for not being semantic. This article examines the questions of why and how the Web of Data, expressed in the Resource Description Framework (RDF), has come to be known as the Semantic Web. Contrary to previous papers, we deliberately take a descriptive stance and do not start from preconceived ideas about the nature of semantics. Instead, we mainly base our analysis on early design documents of the (Semantic) Web. The main determining factor is shown to be link typing, coupled with the influence of online metadata. Both factors already were present in early web standards and drafts. Our findings indicate that the Semantic Web is directly linked to older artificial intelligence work, despite occasional claims to the contrary. Because of link typing, the Semantic Web can be considered an example of a semantic network. Originally network representations of the meaning of natural language utterances, semantic networks have eventually come to refer to any networks with typed (usually directed) links. We discuss possible causes for this shift and suggest that it may be due to confounding paradigmatic and syntagmatic semantic relations.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.2173-2181
  2. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.03 
    0.029302588 = product of:
  0.058605175 = sum of:
    0.01960291 = weight(_text_:information in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01960291 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
    0.039002266 = product of:
      0.07800453 = sum of:
        0.07800453 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07800453 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20161359 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
  3. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00 
    0.004158405 = product of:
  0.01663362 = sum of:
    0.01663362 = weight(_text_:information in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01663362 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  4. Zhou, H.; Guns, R.; Engels, T.C.E.: Towards indicating interdisciplinarity : characterizing interdisciplinary knowledge flow (2023) 0.00 
    0.004158405 = product of:
  0.01663362 = sum of:
    0.01663362 = weight(_text_:information in 1072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01663362 = score(doc=1072,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1072, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1072)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This study contributes to the recent discussions on indicating interdisciplinarity, that is, going beyond catch-all metrics of interdisciplinarity. We propose a contextual framework to improve the granularity and usability of the existing methodology for interdisciplinary knowledge flow (IKF) in which scientific disciplines import and export knowledge from/to other disciplines. To characterize the knowledge exchange between disciplines, we recognize three aspects of IKF under this framework, namely broadness, intensity, and homogeneity. We show how to utilize them to uncover different forms of interdisciplinarity, especially between disciplines with the largest volume of IKF. We apply this framework in two use cases, one at the level of disciplines and one at the level of journals, to show how it can offer a more holistic and detailed viewpoint on the interdisciplinarity of scientific entities than aggregated and context-unaware indicators. We further compare our proposed framework, an indicating process, with established indicators and discuss how such information tools on interdisciplinarity can assist science policy practices such as performance-based research funding systems and panel-based peer review processes.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.11, S.1325-1340
  5. Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Simulating growth of the h-index (2009) 0.00 
    0.0034305095 = product of:
  0.013722038 = sum of:
    0.013722038 = weight(_text_:information in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013722038 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.2, S.410-417
  6. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012) 0.00 
    0.0029404366 = product of:
  0.011761746 = sum of:
    0.011761746 = weight(_text_:information in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011761746 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1662-1665
  7. Zuccala, A.; Guns, R.; Cornacchia, R.; Bod, R.: Can we rank scholarly book publishers? : a bibliometric experiment with the field of history (2015) 0.00 
    0.0024503637 = product of:
  0.009801455 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1333-1347
  8. Kulczycki, E.; Guns, R.; Pölönen, J.; Engels, T.C.E.; Rozkosz, E.A.; Zuccala, A.A.; Bruun, K.; Eskola, O.; Starcic, A.I.; Petr, M.; Sivertsen, G.: Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities : a seven-country European study (2020) 0.00 
    0.0024503637 = product of:
  0.009801455 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=11,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.11, S.1371-1385
  9. Zhou, H.; Guns, R.; Engels, T.C.E.: Are social sciences becoming more interdisciplinary? : evidence from publications 1960-2014 (2022) 0.00 
    0.0024503637 = product of:
  0.009801455 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=646)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.9, S.1201-1221
  10. Kulczycki, E.; Huang, Y.; Zuccala, A.A.; Engels, T.C.E.; Ferrara, A.; Guns, R.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.; Taskin, Z.; Zhang, L.: Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe (2022) 0.00 
    0.0024503637 = product of:
  0.009801455 = sum of:
    0.009801455 = weight(_text_:information in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009801455 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.12, S.1741-1754

Authors

Years

Themes