Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Haider, J."
  1. Sundin, O.; Lewandowski, D.; Haider, J.: Whose relevance? : Web search engines as multisided relevance machines (2022) 0.02
    0.022535985 = sum of:
      0.020947387 = product of:
        0.08378955 = sum of:
          0.08378955 = weight(_text_:authors in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08378955 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0015885972 = product of:
        0.0047657914 = sum of:
          0.0047657914 = weight(_text_:s in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0047657914 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This opinion piece takes Google's response to the so-called COVID-19 infodemic, as a starting point to argue for the need to consider societal relevance as a complement to other types of relevance. The authors maintain that if information science wants to be a discipline at the forefront of research on relevance, search engines, and their use, then the information science research community needs to address itself to the challenges and conditions that commercial search engines create in. The article concludes with a tentative list of related research topics.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.5, S.637-642
  2. Weller, T.; Haider, J.: Where do we go from here? : an opinion on the future of LIS as an academic discipline in the UK (2007) 0.02
    0.02229477 = sum of:
      0.021160059 = product of:
        0.084640235 = sum of:
          0.084640235 = weight(_text_:authors in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084640235 = score(doc=823,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23764841 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0011347122 = product of:
        0.0034041367 = sum of:
          0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0034041367 = score(doc=823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052129436 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=823)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss the current situation of academic LIS research, specifically in the UK and to provide some thoughts considering the future of the discipline. According to the opinion of the authors, this situation is characterised by a lack of cohesion, the need for justification of academic research in terms of its immediate applicability to the professional education of practitioners, and a disjuncture between the information profession and information research. The paper attempts to offer introductory thoughts regarding these circumstances. Design/methodology/approach - The current situation is briefly reviewed and commented on from the authors' viewpoint. Aspects of Pierre Bourdieu's study of the university as a hierarchically structured field of forces are considered. Some reference is made to previous literature. Findings - The paper advances the view that the role of academic LIS research, debate and theory formation needs to be strengthened and that this needs to be reflected in the curriculum more strongly. Originality/value - The paper attempts to highlight consistently overlooked contributing factors, and thus aims to shift the perspective towards role and position of LIS research within academia, rather than vis-à-vis the professional education it is connected to. It aims to stimulate discussion of the current situation, of how it can be perceived, and of ways to address it.
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 59(2007) no.4/5, S.475-482
  3. Haider, J.: ¬The structuring of information through search : sorting waste with Google (2016) 0.01
    0.010700872 = product of:
      0.021401744 = sum of:
        0.021401744 = product of:
          0.032102615 = sum of:
            0.003851341 = weight(_text_:s in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003851341 = score(doc=3073,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
            0.028251275 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028251275 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1825484 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Location
    S
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.4, S.390-406
  4. Sundin, O.; Haider, J.; Andersson, C.; Carlsson, H.; Kjellberg, S.: ¬The search-ification of everyday life and the mundane-ification of search (2017) 0.00
    8.023627E-4 = product of:
      0.0016047254 = sum of:
        0.0016047254 = product of:
          0.004814176 = sum of:
            0.004814176 = weight(_text_:s in 3546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004814176 = score(doc=3546,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 3546, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3546)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.2, S.224-243
  5. Haider, J.; Bawden, D.: Conceptions of "information poverty" in LIS : a discourse analysis (2007) 0.00
    5.673561E-4 = product of:
      0.0011347122 = sum of:
        0.0011347122 = product of:
          0.0034041367 = sum of:
            0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034041367 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 63(2007) no.4, S.534-557
  6. Haider, J.: Of the rich and the poor and other curious minds : on open access and "development" (2007) 0.00
    5.673561E-4 = product of:
      0.0011347122 = sum of:
        0.0011347122 = product of:
          0.0034041367 = sum of:
            0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034041367 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 59(2007) no.4/5, S.449-461
  7. Haider, J.; Åström, F.: Dimensions of trust in scholarly communication : problematizing peer review in the aftermath of John Bohannon's "Sting" in science (2017) 0.00
    5.673561E-4 = product of:
      0.0011347122 = sum of:
        0.0011347122 = product of:
          0.0034041367 = sum of:
            0.0034041367 = weight(_text_:s in 3353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0034041367 = score(doc=3353,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.056677084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052129436 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3353, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3353)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.450-467