Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Haley, M.R."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Haley, M.R.; McGee, M.K.: ¬A parametric "parent metric" approach for comparing maximum-normalized journal ranking metrics (2018) 0.01 
    0.014634522 = product of:
  0.07317261 = sum of:
    0.07317261 = product of:
      0.14634521 = sum of:
        0.14634521 = weight(_text_:index in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14634521 = score(doc=3313,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a parametric approach for facilitating inter-metric and inter-field comparisons of citation-based journal ranking metrics. The mechanism is simple to apply and adjusts for metric magnitude differentials and distributional asymmetries in the rank-score curves. The method is demonstrated using h-index, AWCR-index, g-index, and e-index data from journals in Accounting, Economics, and Finance.
  2. Haley, M.R.: Ranking top economics and finance journals using Microsoft academic search versus Google scholar : How does the new publish or perish option compare? (2014) 0.01 
    0.010975891 = product of:
  0.054879453 = sum of:
    0.054879453 = product of:
      0.109758906 = sum of:
        0.109758906 = weight(_text_:index in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109758906 = score(doc=1255,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Recently, Harzing's Publish or Perish software was updated to include Microsoft Academic Search as a second citation database search option for computing various citation-based metrics. This article explores the new search option by scoring 50 top economics and finance journals and comparing them with the results obtained using the original Google Scholar-based search option. The new database delivers significantly smaller scores for all metrics, but the rank correlations across the two databases for the h-index, g-index, AWCR, and e-index are significantly correlated, especially when the time frame is restricted to more recent years. Comparisons are also made to the Article Influence score from eigenfactor.org and to the RePEc h-index, both of which adjust for journal-level self-citations.