Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011299702 = product of:
  0.056498513 = sum of:
    0.056498513 = weight(_text_:system in 7658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056498513 = score(doc=7658,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 7658, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7658)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

The C(K)onstance Hypertext System (KHS) is an elaborated example of an open hypertext system. Open hypertext systems combine heterogeneous resources and different hypertext applications such as e-mail, text and image hypertexts with access to online databases or other information resources. These hypertexts, to which heterogeneous users have access, grow steadily in size. This paper takes an object-oriented approach and proposes a rigorous typing of hypertext objects to overcome the problems of open hypertext. The advantage of this typing is shown on an e-mail hypertext as a special application of the KHS system. KHS is written in Smalltalk and is being developed on UNIX-machines

0.009319837 = product of:
  0.046599183 = sum of:
    0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 8836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046599183 = score(doc=8836,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 8836, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8836)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.009319837 = product of:
  0.046599183 = sum of:
    0.046599183 = weight(_text_:system in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.046599183 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.3479797 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

0.00745587 = product of:
  0.03727935 = sum of:
    0.03727935 = weight(_text_:system in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03727935 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die Frage, inwieweit Hypertext als informationsvermittelndes System dem menschlichen Wahrnehmungsapparat adäquat ist. Die Vorgehensweise ist vergleiched. Konventioneller linearer Text wird, allein aufgrund seines Erfolgs in der kulturellen Tradition, als adäquat vorausgesetzt. Anhand grundlegender Maximen der Interaktion werden Parallelen und Unterschiede zwischen Text und Hypertext aufgezeigt, und die Konsequenzen dieser Gegenüberstellung werden anhand eines konkreten Hypertextsystems dargestellt