Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hannabuss, S."
  1. Hannabuss, S.: Foucault's view of knowledge (1996) 0.00
    0.0023797948 = product of:
      0.014278769 = sum of:
        0.014278769 = weight(_text_:in in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014278769 = score(doc=6672,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Through an examination of the work of the French historian and philosopher Michel Foucault, discusses the view that knowledge, as represented in the history of ideas and in studies of knowledge paradigms and bibliographical structures, appears coherent and rationalistic. Emphasizes the need to investigate the assumptions and underlying influences on the ways in which discourse embody and shape meanings. Examines links between language, truth and power which are major concerns of foucault. Argues that Foucault's 'archaeological' and 'genealogical' insights into the nature of warranted knowledge are crucial for an understanding of the communication process and the knowledge-organizing activities in information specialists
  2. Hannabuss, S.: Narrative knowledge: eliciting organisational knowledge from storytelling (2000) 0.00
    0.0020609628 = product of:
      0.012365777 = sum of:
        0.012365777 = weight(_text_:in in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012365777 = score(doc=578,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge is critical for organisational effectiveness and competitive advantage. Knowing that you know, knowing what you know, and knowing that you do not know, are critical aspects of knowledge management. Increasing emphasis is placed on the need to identify and use tacit knowledge, as well as explicit knowledge. This discussion examines the unique role of narrative (in the form of storytelling) in eliciting tacit knowledge (including tacit meta-knowledge) in the sensemaking of organisations.
  3. Hannabuss, S.: Information ethics : a contemporary challenge for professionals and the community (1998) 0.00
    0.0018033426 = product of:
      0.010820055 = sum of:
        0.010820055 = weight(_text_:in in 1602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010820055 = score(doc=1602,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1602, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1602)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Acting ethically presents challenges to professional people in an age where there is little consensus on moral beliefs and where competitive practices are increasingly commonplace in the workplace. Professionals dealing with information face particular challenges since information is often regarded as a public good, freely available to everyone as part of a free society. However, information can also be sensitive, confidential and wrong. The dilemmas which arise in this professional area are examined with reference to the wider and deeper ethical issues involved.
  4. Hannabuss, S.: Lyotard and postmodern knowledge (1997) 0.00
    0.0014873719 = product of:
      0.008924231 = sum of:
        0.008924231 = weight(_text_:in in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008924231 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Lyotard's work on postmodern knowledge has been influential on our thinking of paradigms, meta-narratives, legitimation, and contemporary trends in the information economy. These issues are dicussed, criticisms of his work examined, and implications for information professionals explored
  5. Hannabuss, S.: Dialogue and the search for information (1989) 0.00
    0.0011898974 = product of:
      0.0071393843 = sum of:
        0.0071393843 = weight(_text_:in in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071393843 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043654136 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Knowledge of conversation theory and speech act assists us to understand how people search for information. Dialogue embodies meanings and intentionalities, and represents epistemic inquiry. There are implications for the information-processing model of cognitive psychology. Question formulation (erotetics) and turn-taking play important roles in eliciting information, while discourse analysis furnishes us with information about people's categorising, recall, and semantic skills