Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008)
0.03
0.033611286 = product of:
0.11203762 = sum of:
0.019092528 = weight(_text_:und in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019092528 = score(doc=2889,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055691473 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02512737 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.019092528 = weight(_text_:und in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019092528 = score(doc=2889,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055691473 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02512737 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.023752065 = weight(_text_:der in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023752065 = score(doc=2889,freq=12.0), product of:
0.056128684 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.02512737 = queryNorm
0.4231716 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.019092528 = weight(_text_:und in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019092528 = score(doc=2889,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055691473 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02512737 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.019092528 = weight(_text_:und in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019092528 = score(doc=2889,freq=8.0), product of:
0.055691473 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02512737 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.011915441 = product of:
0.023830881 = sum of:
0.023830881 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023830881 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08799177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02512737 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3 = coord(6/20)
- Abstract
- Als dynamische und einfache Form der Auszeichnung von Ressourcen kann sich Tagging im E-Learning positiv auf Partizipation, soziale Navigation und das Verständnis der Lernenden auswirken. Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet verschiedene Möglichkeiten des Einsatzes von Social Tagging in Lehrportalen und E-LearningKursen. Hierzu werden zunächst drei konkrete Anwendungsfälle dargestellt. Anschließend werden aus den Anwendungsfällen gewonnene Erkenntnisse für Lehr-/Lernszenarien zusammengefasst.
- Date
- 21. 6.2009 12:22:44
- Footnote
- Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
- Series
- Medien in der Wissenschaft; Bd.47
- Source
- Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a