Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hartel, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.00 
    0.0035696512 = product of:
  0.010708953 = sum of:
    0.010708953 = product of:
      0.03212686 = sum of:
        0.03212686 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03212686 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16607268 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047424547 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
  2. Hartel, J.: ¬The case against Information and the Body in Library and Information Science (2018) 0.00 
    0.0023902336 = product of:
  0.0071707005 = sum of:
    0.0071707005 = product of:
      0.0215121 = sum of:
        0.0215121 = weight(_text_:2000 in 5523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0215121 = score(doc=5523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19218543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047424547 = queryNorm
            0.11193408 = fieldWeight in 5523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5523)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Another notable aspect of the story above is that certain phenomena-namely, the relationship between human beings and recorded knowledge-are deemed not compelling or research-worthy by other social sciences and are eschewed. The precocious protosociologist in my story sounded almost allergic to paper. Indeed, LIS stands as the resident expert and overseer of the universe of recorded knowledge, and there are no significant contenders, a chance blessing that should be leveraged and celebrated by LIS. On the library side, this authority dates to 2000 BC and the clay tablets in the palace at Nineveh. The information science side has roots in the European documentation movement of a century ago. Later luminaries have continued to position LIS as the singular mediator between people and the documentary realm. Jesse Shera proclaimed that the library brought humankind and the graphic record into harmonious relations. Howard White positioned LIS at the intersection of people and literatures. Marcia Bates cast LIS as a metadiscipline charged with the transmission of and access to recorded knowledge. Why turn our attention away from a nexus that is historically and rightly ours...

Years