Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hartel, J."
  1. Hartel, J.; Thomson, L.: Visual approaches and photography for the study of immediate information space (2011) 0.02
    0.020352896 = sum of:
      0.018274104 = product of:
        0.07309642 = sum of:
          0.07309642 = weight(_text_:authors in 4923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07309642 = score(doc=4923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4923)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0020787928 = product of:
        0.0041575856 = sum of:
          0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 4923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0041575856 = score(doc=4923,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4923, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4923)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This methods-oriented paper introduces visual methods and specifically photography to study immediate information space (Lee, 2003); that is, information-rich settings such as offices or homes. It draws upon the authors' firsthand ethnographic field experiences, a review of relevant theoretical and methodological literature, and an analysis of cases within information studies that have made use of visual and photographic techniques. To begin, the traditions of visual research within anthropology and sociology are traced and major epistemological, methodological, and disciplinary debates associated with visual scholarship are presented. Then, investigations of immediate information space that utilize photography are analyzed, including examples from the areas of personal information management, health informatics, information behavior, and computer-supported cooperative work. Moreover, a section entitled "Applying Photographic Techniques." supplies guidelines for employing photography in a research design, as well as a question-based research framework and tips for photographing information phenomena.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2214-2224
  2. Hartel, J.: ¬The red thread of information (2020) 0.02
    0.01970328 = product of:
      0.03940656 = sum of:
        0.03940656 = sum of:
          0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.003464655 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
          0.035941906 = weight(_text_:22 in 5839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035941906 = score(doc=5839,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18579373 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5839, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 4.2020 21:03:22
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 76(2020) no.3, S.647-656
  3. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Introduction to a Special Issue of Knowledge Organization (2003) 0.01
    0.008480374 = sum of:
      0.00761421 = product of:
        0.03045684 = sum of:
          0.03045684 = weight(_text_:authors in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03045684 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.12592064 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      8.6616375E-4 = product of:
        0.0017323275 = sum of:
          0.0017323275 = weight(_text_:s in 3013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0017323275 = score(doc=3013,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053056188 = queryNorm
              0.030030979 = fieldWeight in 3013, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3013)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is with very great pleasure that we introduce this special issue of Knowledge Organization on Domain Analysis (DA). Domain analysis is an approach to information science (IS) that emphasizes the social, historical, and cultural dimensions of information. It asserts that collective fields of knowledge, or "domains," form the unit of analysis of information science (IS). DA, elsewhere referred to as a sociocognitive (Hjoerland, 2002b; Jacob & Shaw, 1998) or collectivist (Talja et al, 2004) approach, is one of the major metatheoretical perspectives available to IS scholars to orient their thinking and research. DA's focus an domains stands in contrast to the alternative metatheories of cognitivism and information systems, which direct attention to psychological processes and technological processes, respectively. The first comprehensive international formulation of DA as an explicit point of view was Hjoerland and Albrechtsen (1995). However, a concern for information in the context of a community can be traced back to American library historian and visionary Jesse Shera, and is visible a century ago in the earliest practices of special librarians and European documentalists. More recently, Hjoerland (1998) produced a domain analytic study of the field of psychology; Jacob and Shaw (1998) made an important interpretation and historical review of DA; while Hjoerland (2002a) offered a seminal formulation of eleven approaches to the study of domains, receiving the ASLIB 2003 Award. Fjordback Soendergaard; Andersen and Hjoerland (2003) suggested an approach based an an updated version of the UNISIST-model of scientific communication. In fall 2003, under the conference theme of "Humanizing Information Technology" DA was featured in a keynote address at the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (Hjorland, 2004). These publications and events are evidence of growth in representation of the DA view. To date, informal criticism of domain analysis has followed two tracks. Firstly, that DA assumes its communities to be academic in nature, leaving much of human experience unexplored. Secondly, that there is a lack of case studies illustrating the methods of domain analytic empirical research. Importantly, this special collection marks progress by addressing both issues. In the articles that follow, domains are perceived to be hobbies, professions, and realms of popular culture. Further, other papers serve as models of different ways to execute domain analytic scholarship, whether through traditional empirical methods, or historical and philosophical techniques. Eleven authors have contributed to this special issue, and their backgrounds reflect the diversity of interest in DA. Contributors come from North America, Europe, and the Middle East. Academics from leading research universities are represented. One writer is newly retired, several are in their heyday as scholars, and some are doctoral students just entering this field. This range of perspectives enriches the collection. The first two papers in this issue are invited papers and are, in our opinion, very important. Anders Oerom was a senior lecturer at the Royal Scbool of 'Library and Information Science in Denmark, Aalborg Branch. He retired from this position an March 1, 2004, and this paper is his last contribution in this position. We are grateful that he took the time to complete "Knowledge Organization in the Domain of Art Studies - History, Transition and Conceptual Changes" in spite of many other duties. Versions of the paper have previously been presented at a Ph.D-course in knowledge organization and related versions have been published in Danish and Spanish. In many respects, it represents a model of how a domain could, or should, be investigated from the DA point of view.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 30(2003) nos.3/4, S.125-127
  4. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains (2003) 0.00
    0.0012126293 = product of:
      0.0024252585 = sum of:
        0.0024252585 = product of:
          0.004850517 = sum of:
            0.004850517 = weight(_text_:s in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004850517 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 30(2003) nos.3/4, S.239-245
  5. Hartel, J.: ¬The serious leisure frontier in library and information science : hobby domains (2003) 0.00
    0.0010393964 = product of:
      0.0020787928 = sum of:
        0.0020787928 = product of:
          0.0041575856 = sum of:
            0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041575856 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 30(2003) nos.3/4, S.228-238
  6. Kari, J.; Hartel, J.: Information and higher things in life : addressing the pleasurable and the profound in information science (2007) 0.00
    0.0010393964 = product of:
      0.0020787928 = sum of:
        0.0020787928 = product of:
          0.0041575856 = sum of:
            0.0041575856 = weight(_text_:s in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041575856 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1131-1147
  7. Hartel, J.: Managing documents at home for serious leisure : a case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking (2010) 0.00
    8.6616375E-4 = product of:
      0.0017323275 = sum of:
        0.0017323275 = product of:
          0.003464655 = sum of:
            0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003464655 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 66(2010) no.6, S.847-874
  8. Hartel, J.: ¬An arts-informed study of information using the draw-and-write technique (2014) 0.00
    8.6616375E-4 = product of:
      0.0017323275 = sum of:
        0.0017323275 = product of:
          0.003464655 = sum of:
            0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 1303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003464655 = score(doc=1303,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1303, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1303)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1349-1367
  9. Hartel, J.; Savolainen, R.: Pictorial metaphors for information (2016) 0.00
    8.6616375E-4 = product of:
      0.0017323275 = sum of:
        0.0017323275 = product of:
          0.003464655 = sum of:
            0.003464655 = weight(_text_:s in 3163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003464655 = score(doc=3163,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3163, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 72(2016) no.5, S.794-812
  10. Hartel, J.: ¬The case against Information and the Body in Library and Information Science (2018) 0.00
    7.5011986E-4 = product of:
      0.0015002397 = sum of:
        0.0015002397 = product of:
          0.0030004794 = sum of:
            0.0030004794 = weight(_text_:s in 5523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0030004794 = score(doc=5523,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.057684682 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053056188 = queryNorm
                0.052015185 = fieldWeight in 5523, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=5523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: DOI: 10.1353/lib.2018.0018. Vgl. auch den Kommentar in: Lueg, C.: To be or not to be (embodied): that is not the question. In: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.1, S.114-117. (Opinion paper) Two articles in a recent special issue on Information and the Body published in the journal Library Trends stand out because of the way they are identifying, albeit indirectly, a formidable challenge to library information science (LIS). In her contribution, Bates warns that understanding information behavior demands recognizing and studying "any one important element of the ecology [in which humans are embedded]." Hartel, on the other hand, suggests that LIS would not lose much but would have lots to gain by focusing on core LIS themes instead of embodied information, since the latter may be unproductive, as LIS scholars are "latecomer[s] to a mature research domain." I would argue that LIS as a discipline cannot avoid dealing with those pesky mammals aka patrons or users; like the cognate discipline and "community of communities" human computer interaction (HCI), LIS needs the interdisciplinarity to succeed. LIS researchers are uniquely positioned to help bring together LIS's deep understanding of "information" and embodiment perspectives that may or may not have been developed in other disciplines. LIS researchers need to be more explicit about what their original contribution is, though, and what may have been appropriated from other disciplines.
    Source
    Library trends. 66(2018) no.4, S.585-588