Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Harter, S.P."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Harter, S.P.: Scholarly communication and electronic journals : an impact study (1998) 0.08 
    0.08284669 = product of:
  0.12427004 = sum of:
    0.09717445 = weight(_text_:citation in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09717445 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04999695 = queryNorm
        0.4144783 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.027095586 = product of:
      0.054191172 = sum of:
        0.054191172 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054191172 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1750808 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Studies the effects of e-journals on the scholarly communities they are serving. Considers to what extent scholars and researchers are aware of, influenced by, using, or building their own work on research published in e-journals. Draws a sample of scholarly, peer-reviewed e-journals and conducts several analyzes thorugh citation analysis. The data show that the impact of journals on scholarly communication has been minimal
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:56:06
  2. Harter, S.P.; Nisonger, T.E.; Weng, A.: Semantic relationsships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals (1993) 0.06 
    0.0591654 = product of:
  0.0887481 = sum of:
    0.06073403 = weight(_text_:citation in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06073403 = score(doc=5644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23445003 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04999695 = queryNorm
        0.25904894 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6892867 = idf(docFreq=1104, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
    0.02801407 = product of:
      0.05602814 = sum of:
        0.05602814 = weight(_text_:reports in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05602814 = score(doc=5644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.24881059 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The act of referencing another author's work in a scholarly or research paper is usually assumed to signal a direct semantic relationship between the citing and cited work. The present article reports a study that examines this assumption directly. The purpose of the research is to investigate the semantic relationship between citing and cited documents for a sample of document pairs in three journals in library and information science: 'Library journal', 'College and research libraries' and 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science'. A macroanalysis, absed on a comparison of the Library of Congress class numbers assigned citing and cited documents, and a microanalysis, based on a comparison of descriptors assigned citing and cited documents by three indexing and abstracting journals, ERIC, LISA and LiLi, were conducted. Both analyses suggest that the subject similarity among pairs of cited and citing documents is typically very small, supporting a subjective, psychological view of relevance and a trial-and-error, heuristic understanding of the information search and research processes. The results of the study have implications for collection development, for an understanding of psychological relevance, and for the results of doing information retrieval using cited references. Several intriguing methodological questions are raised for future research, including the role of indexing depth, specifity, and quality on the measurement of document similarity
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  3. Harter, S.P.: Colinked descriptors (1993) 0.01 
    0.014940838 = product of:
  0.044822514 = sum of:
    0.044822514 = product of:
      0.08964503 = sum of:
        0.08964503 = weight(_text_:reports in 7963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08964503 = score(doc=7963,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2251839 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04999695 = queryNorm
            0.39809695 = fieldWeight in 7963, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.503953 = idf(docFreq=1329, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7963)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports the preliminary results of an investigation into the effectiveness of colinked descriptors, a new concept and technique suitable for incorporating into the design of interfaces for information retrieval. The idea is borrowed from the analogous idea in bibliometrics-cocited references. Preliminary results suggest that the technique is extremely effective. As a retrieval technique, colinked descriptors can easily be incorporated into information retrieval interfaces, front-end systems, or standalone, pre-search systems

Authors

Themes