Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.02
0.015596304 = product of:
0.109174125 = sum of:
0.109174125 = sum of:
0.07557104 = weight(_text_:studies in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07557104 = score(doc=4411,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.45816267 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033603087 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
