-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.03
0.031194182 = product of:
0.062388364 = sum of:
0.062388364 = sum of:
0.020933531 = weight(_text_:m in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020933531 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12689881 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.041454833 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041454833 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17857634 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.03
0.025995154 = product of:
0.051990308 = sum of:
0.051990308 = sum of:
0.01744461 = weight(_text_:m in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01744461 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12689881 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.034545697 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034545697 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17857634 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997)
0.03
0.025392387 = product of:
0.050784774 = sum of:
0.050784774 = product of:
0.2031391 = sum of:
0.2031391 = weight(_text_:editors in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2031391 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34234476 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.5933758 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Structured abstracts have now become widespread in medical research journals. Considers whether or not such structured abstracts can be used effectively in social science journals. Reviews a a selection of studies to see if structured abstracts written for social science journals are more informative, easier to read and easier to search than their traditional equivalents. Results suggest that structured abstracts are appropriate for social science journals. Editors of social science journals should consider adopting structured abstracts
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.03
0.025392387 = product of:
0.050784774 = sum of:
0.050784774 = product of:
0.2031391 = sum of:
0.2031391 = weight(_text_:editors in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2031391 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34234476 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.5933758 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to consider whether or not structured abstracts can be used efectively in non medical science periodicals. Reviews a selection of studies on structured abstracts from the medical and psychological literature, presents examples of structured abstracts published in non medical science periodicals and considers how original abstracts might be written in a structured form for these periodicals. Concludes that, in light of these example studies, editors of these periodicals should consider the value of adopting structured abstracts
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995)
0.01
0.005233383 = product of:
0.010466766 = sum of:
0.010466766 = product of:
0.020933531 = sum of:
0.020933531 = weight(_text_:m in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020933531 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12689881 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.050995152 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
