-
Hartley, J.: Applying psychology to text design : a case history (1997)
0.02
0.019182649 = product of:
0.09591324 = sum of:
0.09591324 = weight(_text_:22 in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09591324 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.3-10
-
Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? (1998)
0.01
0.012010238 = product of:
0.06005119 = sum of:
0.06005119 = weight(_text_:21 in 2999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06005119 = score(doc=2999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 2999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2999)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 21. 2.1999 18:48:19
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.011509589 = product of:
0.05754794 = sum of:
0.05754794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05754794 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996)
0.01
0.009591324 = product of:
0.04795662 = sum of:
0.04795662 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04795662 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356