Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Haynes, K.J.M."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Haynes, K.J.M.; Saye, J.D.; Kaid, L.L.: Cataloging collection-level records for archival video and audio recordings (1993) 0.01 
    0.00801084 = product of:
  0.02403252 = sum of:
    0.02403252 = product of:
      0.04806504 = sum of:
        0.04806504 = weight(_text_:22 in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04806504 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17747258 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    12. 1.2007 14:43:22
  2. Huang, J.; Haynes, K.J.M.: ¬The issue of word division in cataloging Chinese language titles (2004) 0.01 
    0.007891634 = product of:
  0.0236749 = sum of:
    0.0236749 = product of:
      0.0473498 = sum of:
        0.0473498 = weight(_text_:search in 5529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0473498 = score(doc=5529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17614716 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679956 = queryNorm
            0.2688082 = fieldWeight in 5529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5529)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This study addresses how syllable or word division in bibliographic records of Chinese materials affects title keyword searches. Title keyword searches with both syllable division and word division are conducted in OCLC, RLIN, and Peking University Library (PKUL), and results are compared in terms of recall and precision. It is found that with both OCLC and RLIN, the recall and precision percentages vary greatly if the syllables of a keyword in the search are aggregated or not. In contrast, for PKUL, the recall and precision percentages remain high and the same in both ways. The findings suggest that PKUL has two advantages over OCLC and RLIN that would reduce human errors in word division in cataloging and searching.

Authors

Years