Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007)
0.00
0.0047992123 = product of:
0.028795274 = sum of:
0.01605707 = product of:
0.04817121 = sum of:
0.04817121 = weight(_text_:21st in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04817121 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18985903 = queryWeight, product of:
5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
0.033070438 = queryNorm
0.25372094 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012738204 = weight(_text_:internet in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012738204 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.033070438 = queryNorm
0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
- Abstract
- Therefore our main research questions are as follows: - Is it possible to discover regular patterns in tag usage and to establish a stable category model? - Does a specific tagging language comparable to internet slang or chatspeak evolve? - How do social tags differ from traditional (author / expert) keywords? - To what degree are social tags taken from or findable in the full text of the tagged resource? - Do tags in a research literature context go beyond simple content description (e.g. tags indicating time or task-related information, cf. Kipp et al. 2006)?
- Content
- Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
