Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Herb, U."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Herb, U.: Auch Pierre Bourdieu ist ein Indexierungsopfer (2017) 0.03
    0.02648839 = product of:
      0.079465166 = sum of:
        0.011695079 = weight(_text_:in in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011695079 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
        0.067770086 = weight(_text_:u in 3669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067770086 = score(doc=3669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 3669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3669)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Interview mit Terje Tüür-Fröhlich über Fallstricke und Fehler informetrischer Analysen, Fehlern in Zitationsdatenbanken.
  2. Herb, U.: Überwachungskapitalismus und Wissenschaftssteuerung (2019) 0.02
    0.02389699 = product of:
      0.07169097 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
        0.06389425 = weight(_text_:u in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06389425 = score(doc=5624,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.40930554 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Der Text ist eine überarbeitete Version des von Herb, U. (2018): Zwangsehen und Bastarde : Wohin steuert Big Data die Wissenschaft? In: Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 69(2-3), S. 81-88. DOI:10.1515/iwp-2018-0021.
  3. Herb, U.: Ablehnungsquoten wissenschaftlicher Journale (2016) 0.02
    0.017658927 = product of:
      0.052976776 = sum of:
        0.007796719 = weight(_text_:in in 2701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007796719 = score(doc=2701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06484802 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2701)
        0.045180056 = weight(_text_:u in 2701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045180056 = score(doc=2701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15610404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047673445 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2701)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Je höher die Ablehnungsrate eines wissenschaftlichen Journals, desto exklusiver aus Sicht von Autoren das Privileg einer akzeptierten Einreichung. Und - so die Annahme - umso größer die Qualität der publizierenden Journale. Eine Untersuchung widerspricht nun dieser landläufigen Meinung und spielt in die Hände von Kritikern wie Prof. Gerhard Fröhlich von der Universität Linz, der Ablehnungsquoten als reinen Prestigeschmuck ansieht.