Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Herb, U."
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Herb, U.: Sci-hub = Spy-Hub? (2020) 0.02
    0.022445817 = product of:
      0.089783266 = sum of:
        0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018399429 = score(doc=5333,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
        0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018399429 = score(doc=5333,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
        0.016185544 = weight(_text_:der in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016185544 = score(doc=5333,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
        0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018399429 = score(doc=5333,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
        0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018399429 = score(doc=5333,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Phishing-Verdacht gegen die Schattenbibliothek. Wieder einmal drohen der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub, die kostenpflichtige Verlagspublikationen wissenschaftlicher Art unter Umgehung des Copyrights kostenlos verbreitet, juristische Widrigkeiten. Bereits 2017 gestand ein New Yorker Gericht Elsevier, neben Wiley und Springer Nature einer der drei größten Wissenschaftsverlage, 15 Millionen US-Dollar Schadensersatz für Urheberrechtsverletzungen zu, basierend auf einer durch Elsevier dem Gericht vorgelegten Liste von 100 Artikeln, die von den Schattenbibliotheken Sci-Hub und LibGen illegal zur Verfügung gestellt wurden. Dieses und andere Urteile ließen sich jedoch mangels Zugriffes auf Sci-Hub und dessen Verantwortliche außerhalb des juristischen Einflussbereiches der USA nicht durchsetzen.
  2. Herb, U.; Müller, F.: Wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten - von der Randerscheinung zum Flächenbrand (2020) 0.02
    0.019493423 = product of:
      0.07797369 = sum of:
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5726)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5726)
        0.018497765 = weight(_text_:der in 5726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018497765 = score(doc=5726,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 5726, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5726)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5726)
        0.014868983 = weight(_text_:und in 5726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014868983 = score(doc=5726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27704588 = fieldWeight in 5726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5726)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftliches Publizieren im Zeichen betriebswirtschaftlicher Massenproduktion.- Frank Müller sammelt seit Jahren fragwürdige wissenschaftliche Publikationen aus den Natur- und Materialwissenschaften. Er berichtet von Fälschungsquoten im deutlich zweistelligen Prozentbereich sowie von der Schwierigkeit, solche Publikationen zu kennzeichnen oder aus dem wissenschaftlichen Diskurs zurückzuziehen, und macht Vorschläge zu Verbesserung des Kontrollsystems.
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Wissenschaftliches-Fehlverhalten-von-der-Randerscheinung-zum-Flaechenbrand-4875056.html?view=print
  3. Herb, U.: ¬Das wissenschaftliche Publikations- und Reputationssystem ist gehackt (2020) 0.02
    0.018210713 = product of:
      0.09105356 = sum of:
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=5958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=5958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=5958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
        0.02276339 = weight(_text_:und in 5958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02276339 = score(doc=5958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 5958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5958)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Abstract
    Wissenschaftsjournalist Leonid Schneider über Paper Mills, bei denen sich gefälschte wissenschaftliche Papers bestellen und in Journalen veröffentlichen lassen.
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Das-wissenschaftliche-Publikations-und-Reputationssystem-ist-gehackt-4701388.html?view=print