Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
editor's%3a%22National information standards organization%22 1
editores%3a%22National information standards organization%22 1
editors%3a%22National information standards organization%22 1

López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F.: ¬A study of the use of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to learn Boolean queries : a comparative study (2009) 0.00
```
0.00424829 = product of:
  0.01699316 = sum of:
    0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01699316 = score(doc=1751,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

In this article, our interest is focused on the automatic learning of Boolean queries in information retrieval systems (IRSs) by means of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms considering the classic performance criteria, precision and recall. We present a comparative study of four well-known, general-purpose, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to learn Boolean queries in IRSs. These evolutionary algorithms are the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II), the first version of the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA), the second version of SPEA (SPEA2), and the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA).

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1192-1207