Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hertzum, M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hertzum, M.: Information seeking by experimentation : trying something out to discover what happens (2023) 0.01
    0.008438651 = product of:
      0.042193256 = sum of:
        0.042193256 = product of:
          0.06328988 = sum of:
            0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031787917 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038751747 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
            0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03150196 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038751747 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2023 19:22:29
  2. Reid, J.; Lalmas, M.; Finesilver, K.; Hertzum, M.: Best entry points for structured document retrieval : part I: characteristics (2006) 0.01
    0.0068099196 = product of:
      0.034049597 = sum of:
        0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034049597 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.1, S.74-88
  3. Reid, J.; Lalmas, M.; Finesilver, K.; Hertzum, M.: Best entry points for structured document retrieval : part II: types, usage and effectiveness (2006) 0.01
    0.0068099196 = product of:
      0.034049597 = sum of:
        0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034049597 = score(doc=961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.1, S.89-105
  4. Hertzum, M.: Collaborative information seeking : the combined activity of information seeking and collaborative grounding (2008) 0.01
    0.0068099196 = product of:
      0.034049597 = sum of:
        0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 2073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034049597 = score(doc=2073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2073)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.957-962
  5. Hertzum, M.: Breakdowns in collaborative information seeking : a study of the medication process (2010) 0.01
    0.005837074 = product of:
      0.02918537 = sum of:
        0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02918537 = score(doc=4243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.6, S.646-655
  6. Hertzum, M.: Expertise seeking : a review (2014) 0.00
    0.0048642284 = product of:
      0.02432114 = sum of:
        0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02432114 = score(doc=2690,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038751747 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2690, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2690)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.5, S.775-795
  7. Hertzum, M.; Hansen, P.: Empirical studies of collaborative information seeking : a review of methodological issues (2019) 0.00
    0.0017659955 = product of:
      0.008829977 = sum of:
        0.008829977 = product of:
          0.02648993 = sum of:
            0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 5028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02648993 = score(doc=5028,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038751747 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5028, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5028)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Information seeking is often performed in collaborative contexts. The research into such collaborative information seeking (CIS) has been proceeding since the 1990s but lacks methodological discussions. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss methodological issues in existing CIS studies. Design/methodology/approach The authors systematically review 69 empirical CIS studies. Findings The review shows that the most common methods of data collection are lab experiments (43 percent), observation (19 percent) and surveys (16 percent), that the most common methods of data analysis are description (33 percent), statistical testing (29 percent) and content analysis (19 percent) and that CIS studies involve a fairly even mix of novice, intermediate and specialist participants. However, the authors also find that CIS research is dominated by exploratory studies, leaves it largely unexplored in what ways the findings of a study may be specific to the particular study setting, appears to assign primacy to precision at the expense of generalizability, struggles with investigating how CIS activities extend over time and provides data about behavior to a larger extent than about reasons, experiences and especially outcomes. Research limitations/implications The major implication of this review is its identification of the need for a shared model to which individual CIS studies can contribute in a cumulative manner. To support the development of such a model, the authors discuss a model of the core CIS process and a model of the factors that trigger CIS. Originality/value This study assesses the current state of CIS research, provides guidance for future CIS studies and aims to inspire further methodological discussion.