Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hidderley, R."
  • × author_ss:"Rafferty, P."
  1. Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic Indexing : dialogic approaches to indexing (2007) 0.02
    0.021880183 = sum of:
      0.01825141 = product of:
        0.07300564 = sum of:
          0.07300564 = weight(_text_:authors in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07300564 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24157293 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0036287727 = product of:
        0.0072575454 = sum of:
          0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0072575454 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052990302 = queryNorm
              0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to examine three models of subject indexing (i.e. expert-led indexing, author-generated indexing, and user-orientated indexing); and to compare and contrast two user-orientated indexing approaches (i.e. the theoretically-based Democratic Indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs). Design/methodology/approach - The approach to examining Flickr and Democratic Indexing is evaluative. The limitations of Flickr are described and examples are provided. The Democratic Indexing approach, which the authors believe offers a method of marshalling a "free" user-indexed archive to provide useful retrieval functions, is described. Findings - The examination of both Flickr and the Democratic Indexing approach suggests that, despite Shirky's claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of "representative authority". Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature of user-based indexing and social tagging.
    Language
    e
  2. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Democratic indexing : an approach to the retrieval of fiction (1997) 0.00
    0.002116784 = product of:
      0.004233568 = sum of:
        0.004233568 = product of:
          0.008467136 = sum of:
            0.008467136 = weight(_text_:e in 1783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008467136 = score(doc=1783,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052990302 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 1783, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  3. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.00
    0.002116784 = product of:
      0.004233568 = sum of:
        0.004233568 = product of:
          0.008467136 = sum of:
            0.008467136 = weight(_text_:e in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008467136 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052990302 = queryNorm
                0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  4. Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: ¬A survey of Image trieval tools (2004) 0.00
    0.0018143863 = product of:
      0.0036287727 = sum of:
        0.0036287727 = product of:
          0.0072575454 = sum of:
            0.0072575454 = weight(_text_:e in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0072575454 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052990302 = queryNorm
                0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e
  5. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Democratic indexing : an approach to the retrieval of film (1997) 0.00
    0.0015119887 = product of:
      0.0030239774 = sum of:
        0.0030239774 = product of:
          0.006047955 = sum of:
            0.006047955 = weight(_text_:e in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006047955 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.07616667 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052990302 = queryNorm
                0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    e