Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic Indexing : dialogic approaches to indexing (2007)
0.04
0.04358936 = product of:
0.08717872 = sum of:
0.08717872 = product of:
0.17435744 = sum of:
0.17435744 = weight(_text_:indexing in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17435744 = score(doc=752,freq=24.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.8790302 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to examine three models of subject indexing (i.e. expert-led indexing, author-generated indexing, and user-orientated indexing); and to compare and contrast two user-orientated indexing approaches (i.e. the theoretically-based Democratic Indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs). Design/methodology/approach - The approach to examining Flickr and Democratic Indexing is evaluative. The limitations of Flickr are described and examples are provided. The Democratic Indexing approach, which the authors believe offers a method of marshalling a "free" user-indexed archive to provide useful retrieval functions, is described. Findings - The examination of both Flickr and the Democratic Indexing approach suggests that, despite Shirky's claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of "representative authority". Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature of user-based indexing and social tagging.