Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
authors%3a%22M%c3%asker%c3%a4%2c E.%22 2
authors%3a%22M%c3%asted%c3%a4%2c E.%22 2
authors%3a%22M%c3%askey%c3%a4%2c E.%22 2
authors%3a%22M%c3%added%c3%a4%2c E.%22 2
authors%3a%22M%c3%aimed%c3%a4%2c E.%22 2

Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic Indexing : dialogic approaches to indexing (2007) 0.01
```
0.009361665 = sum of:
  0.0066981805 = product of:
    0.053585444 = sum of:
      0.053585444 = weight(_text_:authors in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053585444 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17731223 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
    0.125 = coord(1/8)
  0.0026634843 = product of:
    0.0053269686 = sum of:
      0.0053269686 = weight(_text_:e in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0053269686 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is two-fold: to examine three models of subject indexing (i.e. expert-led indexing, author-generated indexing, and user-orientated indexing); and to compare and contrast two user-orientated indexing approaches (i.e. the theoretically-based Democratic Indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs). Design/methodology/approach - The approach to examining Flickr and Democratic Indexing is evaluative. The limitations of Flickr are described and examples are provided. The Democratic Indexing approach, which the authors believe offers a method of marshalling a "free" user-indexed archive to provide useful retrieval functions, is described. Findings - The examination of both Flickr and the Democratic Indexing approach suggests that, despite Shirky's claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of "representative authority". Originality/value - This paper contributes to the literature of user-based indexing and social tagging.

Language

e

Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.00

0.0015536993 = product of:
  0.0031073985 = sum of:
    0.0031073985 = product of:
      0.006214797 = sum of:
        0.006214797 = weight(_text_:e in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006214797 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Language: e