Hider, P.; Liu, Y.-H.: ¬The use of RDA elements in support of FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.00
0.0015046606 = product of:
0.0030093212 = sum of:
0.0030093212 = product of:
0.0060186423 = sum of:
0.0060186423 = weight(_text_:a in 1958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0060186423 = score(doc=1958,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1958, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Resource Description and Access (RDA) stipulates that certain "core" elements should always be included, where applicable, in bibliographic and authority records, due to their importance in supporting the user tasks defined in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. However, the elements' relative importance has not been empirically tested. This study investigates which elements in bibliographic records are currently most used in a university library catalog, by means of think-aloud sessions conducted by expert and non-expert users, who were assigned sets of typical bibliographic tasks. The results indicate that, in this context at least, the most utilized elements are not all core.
- Type
- a
